ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2025
Establishment and validation of a nomogram of postoperative delirium in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a retrospective study of MIMIC-IV.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Risk prediction models for postoperative delirium in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Development and validation of a nomogram-based risk prediction model for postoperative delirium in patients with stanford type A aortic dissection.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Observational
- Neurological Complications After Thoracic Endovascular Repair (TEVAR): A Narrative Review of the Incidence, Mechanisms and Strategies for Prevention and Management.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Comparative predictive value of preoperative GNRI, PNI, and CONUT for postoperative delirium in geriatric abdominal surgery patients admitted to the ICU.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo establish a nomogram for predicting the occurrence of postoperative delirium (POD) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. MATERIALS AND
methodsData from 5379 patients were retrieved from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-IV) database and divided into a training set and a validation set at a 7:3 ratio. Multivariate logistic regression was conducted to identify independent predictors and establish nomograms to predict the occurrence of POD. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of the model.
resultsA total of 5379 post-cardiac surgery patients were included in the study, with 258 patients in the training set and 113 patients in the validation set developing POD. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified seven independent predictors: age, partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO2), glucose, white blood cell count (Wbc), stroke, anemia and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The prediction model demonstrated good discrimination, with an AUC of 0.702 (95 CI: 0.671-0.734) in the training set and 0.711 (95 CI: 0.7662 - 0.761) in the validation set. The calibration curve of the prediction model closely matched the ideal curve in both the training set and the validation set. In addition, the DCA curve demonstrated that the nomogram has better clinical applicability.
conclusionWe constructed a nomogram for the personalized prediction of delirium in post-cardiac surgery patients, demonstrating satisfactory performance and clinical utility. This tool may help clinicians initiate preventive interventions for POD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.