Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40057786›Full record

ReviewCritical care (London, England)2025

Being an observer of one's own life-a meta-synthesis on the experience of mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care units.

Fritz Sterr, Mareike Hechinger, Lydia Bauernfeind, Christian Rester, Rebecca Palm, Sabine Metzing

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fritz SterrFaculty of Health, School of Nursing Sciences, Witten/Herdecke University, Alfred-Herrhausen-Straße 50, 58455, Witten, Germany. fritz.sterr@uni-wh.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8185-319X
Mareike HechingerFaculty of Applied Healthcare Sciences, Deggendorf Institute of Technology, Land-Au 27, 94469, Deggendorf, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8675-7922
Lydia BauernfeindFaculty of Applied Healthcare Sciences, Deggendorf Institute of Technology, Land-Au 27, 94469, Deggendorf, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-3227-7772
Christian ResterFaculty of Applied Healthcare Sciences, Deggendorf Institute of Technology, Land-Au 27, 94469, Deggendorf, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4666-7954
Rebecca PalmFaculty of Health, School of Nursing Sciences, Witten/Herdecke University, Alfred-Herrhausen-Straße 50, 58455, Witten, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4910-8413
Sabine MetzingFaculty of Health, School of Nursing Sciences, Witten/Herdecke University, Alfred-Herrhausen-Straße 50, 58455, Witten, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4466-5672

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe experience of patients under mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit is described as complex and multifaceted, but an overarching and in-depth understanding of the experience is still missing.

aimTo provide an in-depth analysis and synthesis of patients' experience when being mechanically ventilated in intensive care units.

methodsWe conducted a meta-synthesis according to the methodological recommendations of Sandelowski and Barroso. Our systematic literature search in Medline, CINAHL, and Cochrane was complemented by hand and citation searches. We included only qualitative studies with a rich description of conscious patients' experience under mechanical ventilation. Studies on children, step-down units, noninvasive ventilation and non-scientific journal articles were excluded. After the title, abstract and full-text screening by three reviewers, we performed initial, axial and selective coding and in-depth analysis in MAXQDA. The synthesis was supported by multiple discussion rounds.

resultsOf the 2,563 records identified, 20 studies were included in our synthesis. This revealed the central phenomenon of patients being observers of their own lives. They are yearning for a stable picture of reality and developing various situation-specific needs. Finally, patients are finding ways to deal with the situation. These concepts are interwoven in time and are experienced repeatedly in different dimensions.

conclusionPatients under mechanical ventilation are highly perceptive. Healthcare professionals are particularly responsible for patients. They should reflect on their role in intensive care and must be sensitized to patients' differentiated experience. Registration, Protocol: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/G8Q6X.

Indexed as

Respiration, ArtificialHumansIntensive Care UnitsQualitative ResearchArtificial respirationCritical careIntensive care unitLived experienceMechanical ventilationMeta-synthesisReview

Identifiers

PMID40057786
PMCPMC11889880

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.