Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40059795›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of nutrition2025

Advances in methods for characterising dietary patterns: a scoping review.

Joy M Hutchinson, Amanda Raffoul, Alexandra Pepetone, Lesley Andrade, Tabitha E Williams, Sarah A McNaughton, Rebecca M Leech, Jill Reedy, Marissa M Shams-White, Jennifer E Vena and 7 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Joy M HutchinsonSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1615-7964
Amanda RaffoulDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Alexandra PepetoneSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Lesley AndradeSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Tabitha E WilliamsSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Sarah A McNaughtonHealth and Well-Being Centre for Research Innovation, School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD, Australia.
Rebecca M LeechInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Jill ReedyNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Marissa M Shams-WhitePopulation Science Department, American Cancer Society, Washington, DC, USA.
Jennifer E VenaAlberta's Tomorrow Project, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Kevin W DoddDivision of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Lisa M BodnarSchool of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Benoît LamarcheCentre Nutrition, santé et société (NUTRISS), Institut sur la nutrition et les aliments fonctionnels (INAF), Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4443-5378
Michael P WallaceDepartment of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Megan DeitchlerIntake - Center for Dietary Assessment, FHI Solutions, Washington, DC, USA.
Sanaa HussainSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Sharon I KirkpatrickSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9896-5975

Funding

Informing national guidelines on diet patterns that promote healthy pregnancy outcomesR01HD102313 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BODNAR, LISA M, NAIMI, ASHLEY ISAAC · 2020 to 2024
$3.0M
CIHRNICHD NIH HHS R01 HD102313
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a growing focus on understanding the complexity of dietary patterns and how they relate to health and other factors. Approaches that have not traditionally been applied to characterise dietary patterns, such as latent class analysis and machine learning algorithms, may offer opportunities to characterise dietary patterns in greater depth than previously considered. However, there has not been a formal examination of how this wide range of approaches has been applied to characterise dietary patterns. This scoping review synthesised literature from 2005 to 2022 applying methods not traditionally used to characterise dietary patterns, referred to as novel methods. MEDLINE, CINAHL and Scopus were searched using keywords including latent class analysis, machine learning and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. Of 5274 records identified, 24 met the inclusion criteria. Twelve of twenty-four articles were published since 2020. Studies were conducted across seventeen countries. Nine studies used approaches with applications in machine learning, such as classification models, neural networks and probabilistic graphical models, to identify dietary patterns. The remaining studies applied methods such as latent class analysis, mutual information and treelet transform. Fourteen studies assessed associations between dietary patterns characterised using novel methods and health outcomes, including cancer, cardiovascular disease and asthma. There was wide variation in the methods applied to characterise dietary patterns and in how these methods were described. The extension of reporting guidelines and quality appraisal tools relevant to nutrition research to consider specific features of novel methods may facilitate consistent reporting and enable synthesis to inform policies and programs.

Indexed as

DietFeeding BehaviorClassification AlgorithmsHumansLatent Class AnalysisMachine LearningDietary patternsDiet qualityHealth outcomesLatent class analysisMachine learningNovel methodsScoping review

Identifiers

PMID40059795
PMCPMC12198347

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.