ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Consequences of training data composition for deep learning models in single-cell biology.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Foundation models for single-cell transcriptomics have the potential to augment (or replace) purpose-built tools for a variety of common analyses, especially when data are sparse. Recent work with large language models has shown that training data composition greatly shapes performance; however, to date, single-cell foundation models have ignored this aspect, opting instead to train on the largest possible corpus. We systematically investigate the consequences of training dataset composition on the behavior of deep learning models of single-cell transcriptomics, focusing on human hematopoiesis as a tractable model system and including cells from adult and developing tissues, disease states, and perturbation atlases. We find that (1) these models generalize poorly to unseen cell types, (2) adding malignant cells to a healthy cell training corpus does not necessarily improve modeling of unseen malignant cells, and (3) including an embryonic stem cell differentiation atlas during training improves performance on out-of-distribution tasks. Our results emphasize the importance of diverse training data and suggest strategies to optimize future single-cell foundation models.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.