ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2025
Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS): A Retrospective Study of 51 Chinese Patients.
Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Case Report: Qizhi Yishen Capsule-induced bone marrow granulomas and severe myelosuppression.Frontiers in allergy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a severe and potentially lethal adverse drug reaction. Its clinical complexity and heterogeneity pose challenges for diagnosis and management. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with DRESS who were admitted to our hospital between 2013 and 2022. Data on demographics, culprit drugs, clinical manifestations, laboratory findings, and treatments were collected. Results: Fifty-one patients were included in the final analysis, with 16 probable and 35 definite cases. The most common causative drugs were antiepileptic drugs (15.7%), anti-tuberculosis drugs (15.7%), and Chinese herbs (9.8%). Common skin manifestations included extensive skin involvement (76.5%), facial edema (66.7%), polymorphic maculopapular lesions (66.7%), and exfoliation (56.9%). Eosinophilia and atypical lymphocytes were noted in 96.1% and 68.6% of the patients, respectively. The liver is the most frequently affected organ. Facial edema, extensive skin involvement, and atypical lymphocytes were correlated with higher Registry of Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions (RegiSCAR) scores ( Conclusion: Clinical manifestations of DRESS are complex. Facial edema, extensive skin involvement, and atypical lymphocytes have emerged as significant diagnostic indicators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.