Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40061223›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2025

Investigating passive eDNA samplers and submergence times for marine surveillance.

Ulla von Ammon, Gert-Jan Jeunen, Olivier Laroche, Xavier Pochon, Neil J Gemmell, Jo-Ann L Stanton, Anastasija Zaiko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ulla von AmmonMarine Biosecurity, Cawthron Institute, Nelson, Tasman, New Zealand.
Gert-Jan JeunenDepartment of Marine Science, University of Otago, Dunedin, Otago, New Zealand.
Olivier LarocheMarine Biosecurity, Cawthron Institute, Nelson, Tasman, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-0755-0083
Xavier PochonMarine Biosecurity, Cawthron Institute, Nelson, Tasman, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-9510-0407
Neil J GemmellDepartment of Anatomy, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, Otago, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-0671-3637
Jo-Ann L StantonDepartment of Anatomy, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, Otago, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-8139-4694
Anastasija ZaikoSequench Ltd, Nelson, Tasman, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Passive environmental DNA (eDNA) samplers offer a cost-effective and scalable approach to marine biodiversity monitoring, potentially aiding detections of non-indigenous species. This study explored the efficiency of passive eDNA samplers to detect a variety of globally problematic marine invasive species in field conditions:

Indexed as

Aquatic OrganismsDNA, EnvironmentalEnvironmental MonitoringIntroduced SpeciesAnimalsBiodiversityPolymerase Chain ReactionRNA, Ribosomal, 18SDNA, EnvironmentalRNA, Ribosomal, 18SBiosecurityDroplet digital PCRFilter membranesIllumina sequencingInvasive speciesMarine surveillanceMetabarcodingPassive sampling

Identifiers

PMID40061223
PMCPMC11890302

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.