ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2025
Colorectal cancer early screening: Dilemmas and solutions.
Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Barriers and facilitators to population participation in colorectal cancer screening: an umbrella review.BMC health services research · 2026Pooled it
- Article
- Data analysis of residents aged 40-59 in colorectal cancer screening in Pudong New Area, Shanghai, 2013-2023.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Tumor-Promoting Gut Microbes in Colorectal Cancer: Mechanisms and Translational Perspectives.International journal of medical sciences · 2026Review
- Effect of family history on detection of adenomas and sessile serrated lesions in individuals aged 40s.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Article
- Advancing Colorectal Cancer Diagnostics from Barium Enema to AI-Assisted Colonoscopy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Article
- Global burden and projection of colorectal cancer attributable to low whole-grain diets: an analysis of GBD 2021 data with Bayesian age-period-cohort modeling.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- The functional and clinical significance of nucleoporin NUP153 across human cancers: a systematic study based on multi-omics analysis and bench work validation.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a prevalent malignancy worldwide, posing a significant public health concern. Mounting evidence has confirmed that timely early screening facilitates the detection of incipient CRC, thereby enhancing patient prognosis. Obviously, non-participation of asymptomatic individuals in screening programs hampers early diagnosis and may adversely affect long-term outcomes for CRC patients. In this letter, we provide a comprehensive overview of the current status of early screening practices, while also thoroughly examine the dilemmas and potential solutions associated with early screening for CRC. In response to these issues, we proffer a set of recommendations directed at governmental authorities and the general public, which focus on augmenting financial investment, establishing standardized screening protocols, advancing technological capabilities, and bolstering public awareness campaigns. The importance of collaborative efforts from various stakeholders cannot be overstated in the quest to enhance early detection rates and alleviate the societal burden of CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.