ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Risk stratification in neuroblastoma patients through machine learning in the multicenter PRIMAGE cohort.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Homovanillic acid and vanillylmandelic acid as neuroblastoma biomarkers in children.Biochemia medica · 2026Review
- Automated Machine Learning Frameworks for Radiomics: Comparative Evaluation Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Feasibility of T2-Weighted MRI Radiomics for Initial Risk Stratification in Pediatric Neuroblastoma.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Engineering CAR T NK and NKT cell therapies to target cancer stem cells and overcome stem like resistance.Discover oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Neuroblastoma, the most prevalent solid cancer in children, presents significant biological and clinical heterogeneity. This inherent heterogeneity underscores the need for more precise prognostic markers at the time of diagnosis to enhance patient stratification, allowing for more personalized treatment strategies. In response, this investigation developed a machine learning model using clinical, molecular, and magnetic resonance (MR) radiomics features at diagnosis to predict patient's overall survival (OS) and improve their risk stratification. Methods: PRIMAGE database, including 513 patients (discovery cohort), was used for model training, validation, and testing. Additional 22 patients from different hospitals served as an external independent cohort. Primary tumor segmentation on T2-weighted MR images was semi-automatically edited by an experienced radiologist. From this area, 107 radiomics features were extracted. For the development of the prediction model, radiomics features were harmonized following the nested ComBat methodology and nested cross-validation approach was employed to determine the optimal preprocessing and model configuration. Results: The discovery cohort yielded a 78.8 ± 4.9 and 77.7 ± 6.1 of C index and time-dependent area under de curve (AUC), respectively, over the test set, with a random survival forest exhibiting the best performance. In the independent cohort, a C-index of 93.4 and a time-dependent AUC of 95.4 were achieved. Interpretability analysis identified lesion heterogeneity, size, and molecular variables as crucial factors in OS prediction. The model stratified neuroblastoma patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk categories, demonstrating a superior stratification compared to standard-of-care classification system in both cohorts. Discussion: Our results suggested that radiomics features improve current risk stratification systems in patients with neuroblastoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.