Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40061893›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

Risk stratification in neuroblastoma patients through machine learning in the multicenter PRIMAGE cohort.

Jose Lozano-Montoya, Ana Jimenez-Pastor, Almudena Fuster-Matanzo, Glen J Weiss, Leonor Cerda-Alberich, Diana Veiga-Canuto, Blanca Martínez-de-Las-Heras, Adela Cañete-Nieto, Sabine Taschner-Mandl, Barbara Hero and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jose Lozano-MontoyaResearch & Frontiers in AI Department, Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL, Valencia, Spain.
Ana Jimenez-PastorResearch & Frontiers in AI Department, Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL, Valencia, Spain.
Almudena Fuster-MatanzoResearch & Frontiers in AI Department, Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL, Valencia, Spain.
Glen J WeissMedical Studies Department, Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim Inc., New York, NY, United States.
Leonor Cerda-AlberichBiomedical Imaging Research Group, La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia,, Spain.
Diana Veiga-CanutoPediatric Oncology and Hematology Section, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain.
Blanca Martínez-de-Las-HerasBiomedical Imaging Research Group, La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia,, Spain.
Adela Cañete-NietoPediatric Oncology and Hematology Section, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain.
Sabine Taschner-MandlSabine Taschner-Mandl Taschner-Mandl Group, St. Anna Children's Cancer Research Institute, Vienna, Austria.
Barbara HeroDepartment of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, University Children's Hospital of Cologne, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Thorsten SimonDepartment of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, University Children's Hospital of Cologne, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Ruth LadensteinClinical Trials Unit, St. Anna Children's Cancer Research Institute, Vienna, Austria.
Luis Marti-BonmatiBiomedical Imaging Research Group, La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia,, Spain.
Angel Alberich-BayarriResearch & Frontiers in AI Department, Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL, Valencia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Neuroblastoma, the most prevalent solid cancer in children, presents significant biological and clinical heterogeneity. This inherent heterogeneity underscores the need for more precise prognostic markers at the time of diagnosis to enhance patient stratification, allowing for more personalized treatment strategies. In response, this investigation developed a machine learning model using clinical, molecular, and magnetic resonance (MR) radiomics features at diagnosis to predict patient's overall survival (OS) and improve their risk stratification. Methods: PRIMAGE database, including 513 patients (discovery cohort), was used for model training, validation, and testing. Additional 22 patients from different hospitals served as an external independent cohort. Primary tumor segmentation on T2-weighted MR images was semi-automatically edited by an experienced radiologist. From this area, 107 radiomics features were extracted. For the development of the prediction model, radiomics features were harmonized following the nested ComBat methodology and nested cross-validation approach was employed to determine the optimal preprocessing and model configuration. Results: The discovery cohort yielded a 78.8 ± 4.9 and 77.7 ± 6.1 of C index and time-dependent area under de curve (AUC), respectively, over the test set, with a random survival forest exhibiting the best performance. In the independent cohort, a C-index of 93.4 and a time-dependent AUC of 95.4 were achieved. Interpretability analysis identified lesion heterogeneity, size, and molecular variables as crucial factors in OS prediction. The model stratified neuroblastoma patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk categories, demonstrating a superior stratification compared to standard-of-care classification system in both cohorts. Discussion: Our results suggested that radiomics features improve current risk stratification systems in patients with neuroblastoma.

Indexed as

machine learningneuroblastomaoverall survivalpediatricPRIMAGErisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID40061893
PMCPMC11886962

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.