ReviewCureus2025
Cardiac Complications Associated With COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review of Cohort Studies.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Unraveling Rising Mortality: Statistical Insights from Japan and International Comparisons.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The COVID-19 global pandemic affected every human on earth, and we are still currently feeling the repercussions. The unprecedented transmission of the virus and the response as well as the mobilization of the major health authorities internationally resulted in one of the largest-scale immunization drives in modern history. As of January 16, 2025, 13.64 billion COVID-19 vaccines have been administered globally. Cardiac adverse effects, such as the development of pericarditis and or myocarditis after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine, have been a major focus of study. In most systematic reviews reported globally, evidence was synthesized from case reports and case series. This systematic review aims to amalgamate the data from various cohort studies to identify the risk of the development of adverse effects after the COVID-19 vaccine. An extensive review of the literature was done on the following databases: PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Trip database, and Google Scholar. All cohort studies included were completed and available between December 1, 2020 and December 31, 2024 and were based on the cardiac adverse effects from the COVID-19 vaccinations. A total of 18,272 articles were screened initially. Four studies were finally assessed regarding the cardiac side effects of the COVID-19 vaccinations and were ultimately included in the systematic review based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Immunization with an mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine may directly cause cardiovascular adverse events such as the development of myocarditis or pericarditis. The likelihood of such an event occurring is minimal but is most certainly a possibility, the risks of such adverse effects are notably raised in younger males between the ages of 16 and 39 years in age receiving their second dose of an mRNA-based vaccine. It is thus advised that those individuals who fall into the above category be labeled as "higher risk" and should have increased post-vaccination surveillance and follow-up to earlier diagnose the development thereof. The benefits of the vaccine still do, however, by far outweigh the minimal risks involved and it is thus advised that immunization effort continues in earnest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.