Evidence mapPaperPMID 40062300Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025

On the development of diagnostic support algorithms based on CPET biosignals data

Rafael F Pinheiro, Rui Fonseca-Pinto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rafael F PinheiroCenter for Innovative Care and Health Technology (ciTechCare), School of Health Sciences (ESSLei), Polytechnic University of Leiria, Leiria, Leiria, Portugal.
Rui Fonseca-PintoCenter for Innovative Care and Health Technology (ciTechCare), School of Health Sciences (ESSLei), Polytechnic University of Leiria, Leiria, Leiria, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For preventing health complications and reducing the strain on healthcare systems, early identification of diseases is imperative. In this context, artificial intelligence has become increasingly prominent in the field of medicine, offering essential support for disease diagnosis. This article introduces an algorithm that builds upon an earlier methodology to assess biosignals acquired through cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) for identifying metabolic syndrome (MS), heart failure (HF), and healthy individuals (H). Leveraging support vector machine (SVM) technology, a well-known machine learning classification method, in combination with wavelet transforms for feature extraction, the algorithm takes an innovative approach. The model was trained on CPET data from 45 participants, including 15 with MS, 15 with HF, and 15 healthy controls. For binary classification tasks, the SVM with a polynomial kernel and 5-level wavelet transform (SVM-POL-BW5) outperformed similar methods described in the literature. Moreover, one of the main contributions of this study is the development of a multi-class classification algorithm using the SVM employing a linear kernel and 3-level wavelet transforms (SVM-LIN-MW3), reaching an average accuracy of 95%. In conclusion, the application of SVM-based algorithms combined with wavelet transforms to analyze CPET data shows promise in diagnosing various diseases, highlighting their adaptability and broader potential applications in healthcare.

Indexed as

CPETEarly diagnosis systemsHeart diseaseMetabolic diseasesMulti-class classification

Identifiers

PMID40062300
PMCPMC11888874

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.