ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025
On the development of diagnostic support algorithms based on CPET biosignals data
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A bibliometric analysis of artificial intelligence applications in heart failure.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For preventing health complications and reducing the strain on healthcare systems, early identification of diseases is imperative. In this context, artificial intelligence has become increasingly prominent in the field of medicine, offering essential support for disease diagnosis. This article introduces an algorithm that builds upon an earlier methodology to assess biosignals acquired through cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) for identifying metabolic syndrome (MS), heart failure (HF), and healthy individuals (H). Leveraging support vector machine (SVM) technology, a well-known machine learning classification method, in combination with wavelet transforms for feature extraction, the algorithm takes an innovative approach. The model was trained on CPET data from 45 participants, including 15 with MS, 15 with HF, and 15 healthy controls. For binary classification tasks, the SVM with a polynomial kernel and 5-level wavelet transform (SVM-POL-BW5) outperformed similar methods described in the literature. Moreover, one of the main contributions of this study is the development of a multi-class classification algorithm using the SVM employing a linear kernel and 3-level wavelet transforms (SVM-LIN-MW3), reaching an average accuracy of 95%. In conclusion, the application of SVM-based algorithms combined with wavelet transforms to analyze CPET data shows promise in diagnosing various diseases, highlighting their adaptability and broader potential applications in healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.