ReviewAmerican journal of hematology2025
Targeted Therapies in Myelofibrosis: Present Landscape, Ongoing Studies, and Future Perspectives.
Review in American journal of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unmasking Additional Mutations: A Single Institution Study in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.Cancers · 2026Article
- Selinexor for myelofibrosis or a drug in search of a disease?Blood cancer journal · 2026Article
- Glycolytic-inflammatory crosstalk mediated by Glyco-PMF-Rux hub genes drives PMF progression and ruxolitinib resistance.Genes & genomics · 2026Article
- Review
- Understanding Triple Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms and Identifying Molecular Drivers.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2026Review
- Development Trends of Janus Kinase Inhibitors (JAKi) Over Three Decades: From Common to Rare Diseases.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
- Review
- STK405759 targets microtubules, modulates STAT1, and enhances ruxolitinib efficacy in myeloproliferative neoplasms.American journal of cancer research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Myelofibrosis (MF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm that is accompanied by driver JAK2, CALR, or MPL mutations in more than 90% of cases, leading to constitutive activation of the JAK-STAT pathway. MF is a multifaceted disease characterized by trilineage myeloid proliferation with prominent megakaryocyte atypia and bone marrow fibrosis, as well as splenomegaly, constitutional symptoms, ineffective erythropoiesis, extramedullary hematopoiesis, and a risk of leukemic progression and shortened survival. Therapy can range from observation alone in lower-risk and asymptomatic patients to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, which is the only potentially curative treatment capable of prolonging survival, although burdened by significant morbidity and mortality. The discovery of the JAK2 V617F mutation prompted the development of JAK inhibitors (JAKi) including the first-in-class JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib and subsequent approval of fedratinib, pacritinib, and momelotinib. The latter has shown erythropoietic benefits by suppressing hepcidin expression via activin A receptor type 1 (ACVR1) inhibition, as well as reducing splenomegaly and symptoms. However, the current JAKi behave as anti-inflammatory drugs without a major impact on survival or disease progression. A better understanding of the genetics, mechanisms of fibrosis, cytopenia, and the role of inflammatory cytokines has led to the development of numerous therapeutic agents that target epigenetic regulation, signaling, telomerase, cell cycle, and apoptosis, nuclear export, and pro-fibrotic cytokines. Selective JAK2 V617F inhibitors and targeting of mutant CALR by immunotherapy are the most intriguing and promising approaches. This review focuses on approved and experimental treatments for MF, highlighting their biological background.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.