ArticleTurkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology2025
Evaluation of prenatal and postnatal outcomes of fetuses with intrauterine cardiac anomalies: Tertiary center experience.
Article in Turkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diagnostic Impact of Fetal MRI in 556 Fetuses: Where It Adds Value Beyond Ultrasound.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Fetal cardiac anomalies are among the leading causes of infant mortality due to congenital anomalies. The prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart diseases allows for the acquisition of prognostic information before birth and provides insights into treatment options either before or after delivery. This study aims to observe the correlation between the prenatal and postnatal diagnoses of fetuses with cardiac anomalies detected in our perinatology clinic. The goal, by tracking postnatal outcomes and identifying risk factors, is to assist in selecting the most appropriate approach, prioritizing maternal and fetal health. Materials and Methods: The records of 188 fetuses diagnosed during the prenatal period by the Perinatology Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Çukurova University Faculty of Medicine, delivered and admitted to the Çukurova University Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, and undergoing fetal echocardiography by the Pediatric Cardiology Clinic between January 2016 and December 2021, were retrospectively evaluated. Postnatal transthoracic echocardiography results of the infants were also reviewed. Results: Our study was conducted with 188 pregnant women. The most frequently detected cardiac anomalies in the fetuses were conotruncal anomalies, followed by right heart anomalies. The concordance between prenatal and postnatal findings was 88.8%, with a sensitivity of 96.55% and a specificity of 100%. Among the live-born infants with congenital heart disease, significant differences were observed between the group that survived the neonatal period and those who did not, in terms of parental consanguinity, gestational age at birth, birth weight, APGAR scores, and the rate of chromosomal anomaly assessment. Conclusion: Our study emphasized several risk factors. A high concordance was found between our prenatal and postnatal echocardiography findings. In conclusion, we believe that increasing awareness and making screening a routine practice are essential to contributing to healthier future generations. This can be achieved by reducing perinatal mortality and morbidity through appropriate management and equipment, thereby optimizing the well-being of affected individuals in society.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.