Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40063168›Full record

ReviewCurrent heart failure reports2025

Clinical Insights from Proteomics in Heart Failure.

Aynaz Lotfinaghsh, Adnan Imam, Alexander Pompian, Nathan O Stitziel, Ali Javaheri

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current heart failure reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Biomarkers in Heart Failure: A Review and a Wish.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aynaz LotfinaghshCardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Adnan ImamCardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Alexander PompianCardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Nathan O StitzielCardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Ali JavaheriCardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA. ali.javaheri@wustl.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe pathophysiology of heart failure (HF), a complex and heterogenous condition, remains to be fully understood. Troponin and b-type natriuretic peptide are the only biomarkers that are utilized in clinical practice for HF clinical management. Recent advances in proteomics present a powerful tool to identify risk markers and ultimately, potential molecular mechanisms underlying HF pathogenesis. Herein, we explore traditional and novel heart biomarkers, highlighting their potential role in the pathogenesis of HF. RECENT

findingsRecent proteomic analyses have identified numerous proteins including Galectin-3, sST2, GDF-15, FGF21, Endotrophin, THSB-2, ADAMSTL, SVEP1, and anthracycline that are associated with clinical outcomes in HF. These biomarkers are not presently utilized in HF management but may be useful in the future for prediction of death or HF hospitalization. While traditional biomarkers remain essential, proteomic strategies have revealed additional targets that require further mechanistic exploration. Future research should focus on validating these biomarkers and translating proteomic insights into clinical practice to enhance HF management.

Indexed as

Heart FailureProteomicsBiomarkersHumansBiomarkersCardiac BiomarkersHeart failureManagement

Identifiers

PMID40063168

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.