Evidence mapPaperPMID 40063239Full record

ReviewNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2025

Current advancement of immune function paradox of tumour-infiltrating cells and their immunotherapeutic targets: a mini-review.

Veena V Tom, Ann Mary Jose, Sumit Mallick, Athira Sasidharan, Rakshita Pawar, Yogish Somayaji, Ronald Fernandes

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Veena V TomDepartment of Allied Health Sciences, Nitte Gulabi Shetty Memorial Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences (NGSMIPS), NITTE (Deemed to Be University), Deralakatte, Mangaluru, 575018, Karnataka, India.
Ann Mary JoseDepartment of Post Graduate Studies and Research in Biochemistry, St. Aloysius (Deemed to Be University), Mangaluru, 575003, Karnataka, India.
Sumit MallickStem Cells and Regenerative Medicine Centre, Yenepoya Research Centre, Yenepoya (Deemed to Be University), Deralakatte, Mangaluru, 575018, Karnataka, India.
Athira SasidharanDepartment of Allied Health Sciences, Nitte Gulabi Shetty Memorial Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences (NGSMIPS), NITTE (Deemed to Be University), Deralakatte, Mangaluru, 575018, Karnataka, India.
Rakshita PawarDepartment of Allied Health Sciences, Nitte Gulabi Shetty Memorial Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences (NGSMIPS), NITTE (Deemed to Be University), Deralakatte, Mangaluru, 575018, Karnataka, India.
Yogish SomayajiDepartment of Post Graduate Studies and Research in Biochemistry, St. Aloysius (Deemed to Be University), Mangaluru, 575003, Karnataka, India.
Ronald FernandesDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Nitte Gulabi Shetty Memorial Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences (NGSMIPS), NITTE (Deemed to Be University), Deralakatte, Mangaluru, 575018, Karnataka, India. ronaldfernandes@nitte.edu.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer immunotherapy has long been an essential segment of current research and presents several problems to contemporary medicine. Though their precise roles are still elusive, recent studies have highlighted the importance of both innate and adaptive immune defence systems in the development and management of cancer. The immune system plays a crucial role in cancer prevention and control by identifying and eliminating abnormal cells. This activity can be evidenced in tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), immune cells found within and surrounding tumours. TILs often correlate with better patient outcomes, indicating an active immune response against the cancer. This review investigates how these immune systems help tumour cells acquire the ability to infiltrate malignantly and elude immune defences. Tumour-associated macrophages (TAMs), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), and regulatory T cells (Tregs) are among the invading immune cell types whose roles in tumour development and immune suppression are investigated. These cells help cancers avoid being detected by the immune system, which increases their aggressiveness and ability to spread. Further, we have discussed the potential treatment approaches that target these immune processes, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and cutting-edge immunotherapies intended to reestablish robust anti-tumour responses. Researchers can find new ways to improve the efficacy of cancer immunotherapies by comprehending the intricate relationships between malignancies and the immune system. Moreover, we have summarized how targeting the immune response leads to more potent medications, enhancing the patient's outcome and survival.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingNeoplasmsAnimalsHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsTumor MicroenvironmentImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsCancer immunologyImmune evasionImmunotherapyTumour-infiltrating lymphocytesTumour microenvironment

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.