ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025
Predicting pregnancy at the first year following metabolic-bariatric surgery: development and validation of machine learning models.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning in bariatric surgery: a comprehensive systematic review.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMetabolic-bariatric surgery (MBS) is the last effective way to lose weight whom around half of the patients are women of reproductive age. It is recommended an interval of 12 months between surgery and pregnancy to optimize weight loss and nutritional status. Predicting pregnancy up to 12 months after MBS is important for evaluating reproductive health services in bariatric centers; therefore, this study aimed to present a prediction model for pregnancy at the first year following MBS using machine learning (ML) algorithms.
methodsIn a nested case-control study of 473 women with a history of pregnancy after MBS during 2009-2023, predisposing factors in pregnancy within 12 months after MBS were identified and subsequently, several ML models, including the classification algorithms and decision trees, as well as regression analyses, were applied to predict pregnancy up to 12 months after MBS.
resultsThe highest area under the curve (AUC) was 0.920 ± 0.014 (95%CI 0.906, 0.927) for the C5.0 decision tree with sensitivity and specificity of 0.762 ± 0.044 (95%CI 0.739, 0.801) and 0.916 ± 0.028 (95%CI 0.883, 0.922), respectively. This model considered thirteen important factors to predict pregnancy at the first 12 months following MB, including menstrual irregularity, marital status, a history of abnormal fetal development, age, infertility type, parity, gravidity, fertility treatment, presurgery body mass index (BMI), infertility, infertility duration, polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), and type 2 diabetes (T2DM).
conclusionDeveloping the ML models, which predict pregnancy within 12 months after MBS, can help bariatric surgeons and obstetricians to prevent and manage suboptimal surgical response and adverse pregnancy outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40064691What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.