Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40064825›Full record

ArticleAMB Express2025

Phylogenetic analysis of microbial CP-lyase cluster genes for bioremediation of phosphonate.

Precious I Richard, William H Baltosser, Philip H Williams, Qingfang He

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMB Express, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Precious I RichardDepartment of Biology, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, Little Rock, AR, 72204, USA.
William H BaltosserDepartment of Biology, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, Little Rock, AR, 72204, USA.
Philip H WilliamsMidSouth Bioinformatics Center, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, Little Rock, AR, 72204, USA.
Qingfang HeDepartment of Biology, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, Little Rock, AR, 72204, USA. qfhe@ualr.edu.

Funding

Understanding Hesitant AdoptersP20GM103429 · NIGMS · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI Lawrence E Cornett · 2012 to 2026
$60.9M
Arkansas Space Grant Consortium 80NSSC22M0043NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103429
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ever-increasing use of phosphonates and their derivatives has resulted in the discharge of large quantities of these materials into the ecosystem, causing pollution and harmful shifts in microbiome composition. We conducted an extensive phylogenetic analysis to address this mounting problem and to help determine suitable microbes for bioremediation in specific environments. The 84 microorganisms included in our study span the gamut of species and occupied habitats. They degrade phosphonates by expressing an enzyme complex; CP-Lyase transcribed from 14 cistrons. Of the organisms studied, 12, 39, and 25 are singularly suitable for mostly freshwater, marine, or terrestrial habitats, respectively. Others adapted to multihabitats include Calothrix sp. PCC 7507 (both freshwater and marine habitats), Escherichia coli, Kaistia soli, Limoniibacter endophyticus, Marivita sp. and Virgibacillus dokdonensis (both marine and terrestrial habitats), Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans (both freshwater and terrestrial habitats), with Paenibacillus contaminans suitable for freshwater, marine, and terrestrial habitats. All organisms were statistically rooted to glutathione peroxidase for phylogenetic perspective with tree topology dependent upon 50% or greater support. Clustered genes have been shown to have co-evolved based on striking nucleotide similarity and clade groupings within the tree topologies generated.

Indexed as

BioinformaticsBioremediationCoevolutionCyanobacteriaGlyphosate

Identifiers

PMID40064825
PMCPMC11893972

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.