ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparison of the establishment of a rabbit model of carpal tunnel syndrome under ultrasound-guided and landmark-guided methods.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A simple and feasible rabbit model of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) was established using an animal experimental study. Twenty-four New Zealand white rabbits were randomized into a normal group (Group C), a glucose injection model group (Groups N-M) and an ultrasound-guided injection model group (Groups U-M). Each group consisted of 8 rabbits.Electrophysiological and ultrasound examinations were performed before sampling. Hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) staining and electron microscopy were performed to observe the neuropathological changes. During electrophysiological testing 1 week after modeling, the amplitudes of the sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV), distal motor latency (DML) and compound muscle action potential (CMAP ) in the U-M group were significantly different compared to the C group and the N-M group (P < 0.05). Five weeks after modeling, the amplitudes of the SNCV, DML and CMAP in the U-M group and the C group were significantly different (P < 0.05). These differences were statistically significant compared to the DML and CMAP in the N-M group (P < 0.05), and the changes in these parameters were more significant than the results 1 week after modeling (P < 0.05). The difference in CMAP amplitude between the N-M group and C group was statistically significant (P < 0.05), but the other parameters were not significantly different (P > 0.05). Compared to the original modeling method, four injections of 0.3 ml of 10% glucose solution under ultrasound guidance reduced the time required to establish the disease model and increased the stability of the model. Therefore, this technique is a simple and feasible method for establishing a model of rabbit carpal tunnel syndrome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.