ArticleBMC ophthalmology2025
Real-world experience of intravitreal faricimab injection in previously treated neovascular age-related macular degeneration eyes: a case series.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Budget Impact of Faricimab in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration in the Netherlands: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Injection Count.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Pooled it
- Multidimensional evaluation of the potential impact of faricimab availability on healthcare system accessibility for retinal disease treatment in Poland.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Cross-Sectional Survey of Real-World Physician Prescribing Practices for Anti-VEGF Agents in the Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Associated Patient Burden in the United States.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Real-World Outcomes of Switching to Faricimab in Treatment-Experienced and Resistant Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Single-Centre Retrospective Study.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Faricimab for Refractory Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Retrospective Real-World Evidence from India.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFaricimab is a novel anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agent, used to treat patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). This study assessed efficacy and safety of faricimab in previously treated eyes.
methodsThis retrospective study included previously treated nAMD patients who had received at least three faricimab injections. Baseline data were collected from February 2023 to September 2023, and follow-up data were collected until April 2024. The patients were divided into two cohorts: (1) the "Loaded" cohort, which received four weekly injections prior to treatment extension, and (2) the "Interval-Matched" cohort, which continued on the same treatment interval as their previous regimen. Efficacy was evaluated based on the primary outcome measures: central subfield thickness (CST), the presence of macular fluid, and visual outcomes. Safety was assessed through the secondary outcome measure of adverse event reporting.
resultTwo hundred thirty-seven participants (297 eyes) were included with a mean age of 80.7 ± 7 years, 44% were males. 2,237 faricimab injections were administered (7.5 ± 1.9 per eye). In the loaded cohort, CST decreased from 315.1 ± 86.0 µm to 288.0 ± 63.6 µm (p < 0.001). The percentage of dry macula increased from 11.0% to 42.5% (p < 0.001). Vision changed from 67.9 ± 12.3 to 69.3 ± 13.4 letters (p = 0.002), and the injection interval extended from 5.3 ± 1.3 to 6.4 ± 2.1 weeks (p < 0.001). For the interval-matched cohort, CST decreased from 302.8 ± 57.4 µm to 291.2 ± 62.6 µm (p = 0.001). The percentage of dry macula increased from 22.5% to 47.7% (p < 0.001). Vision changed from 65.9 ± 13.8 to 65.0 ± 17.1 letters (p = 0.613), and the injection interval extended from 6.6 ± 2.8 to 7.9 ± 3.2 weeks (p < 0.001). 68 (28.7%) adverse events were reported, of which 9 (3.8%) were serious.
conclusionFaricimab showed beneficial anatomical response with stable vision, and less injections. The loaded cohort exhibited superior outcomes but needed more injections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.