SynthesisBMC cancer2025
Efficacy of liquid biopsy for genetic mutations determination in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review on literatures.
Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Liquid biopsy in solid tumours: expert opinion paper of the European society of pathology.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Review
- Article
- Clinical application of liquid biopsy in the diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer: taking ctDNA for example-a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Somatic mutation profiling by NGS-based liquid biopsy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: frequency, clinical correlates, and prognostic significance.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
- Sputum Liquid Biopsy for Lung Cancer Screening, Diagnosis, Subtyping, Surveillance, Response Prediction, and Prognostication: A Scoping Review.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-powered liquid biopsy in cancer: a paradigm shift in cancer detection and personalized care.Cancer cell international · 2026Review
- Analysis of clinicopathological characteristics in postoperative molecular residual disease-positive stage I non-small cell lung cancer patients.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Small-nucleolar RNA host gene3 (SNHG3) and leukemia-associated non-coding IGF1R activator RNA 1 (LUNAR1) correlated with CRC patients' clinical features: a step-toward ncRNA-precision.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Bibliometric analysis of global research on liquid biopsy for gastric cancer.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Mass spectrometry-based proteomics of FFPE tissues: progress, limitations, and clinical translation barriers.Clinical proteomics · 2025Review
- Redefining the Diagnostic and Therapeutic Landscape of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Era of Precision Medicine.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Circulating Molecular Biomarkers for the Diagnosis and Monitoring of NSCLC-A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Clinical Utility and Limitations of Circulating HPV DNA in Tonsillar Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Narrative Review.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNon-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide and is often diagnosed at advanced stages, limiting treatment options. This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy of liquid biopsy in detecting genetic mutations in NSCLC, focusing on its sensitivity, specificity, clinical utility, and potential to guide personalized treatment strategies.
methodsA systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library to identify relevant studies published between 1990 and September 2024. Eligible studies included comparative analyses of liquid biopsy techniques for NSCLC diagnosis, prognosis, progression, or treatment response. This review adheres to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and assesses study quality using the QUADAS framework.
resultsA total of 30 studies were included. Digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) demonstrated the highest sensitivity, detecting low-frequency mutations such as EGFR T790M at levels as low as 0.01%. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) provided comprehensive mutational profiling, revealing tumor heterogeneity and co-existing mutations but required high-quality plasma samples. The cobas EGFR Mutation Test, while less sensitive than ddPCR, remains widely used due to its clinical accessibility. Emerging methods, including extracellular vesicle analysis, show promise but require further validation. Additionally, liquid biopsy effectively identified non-EGFR mutations, such as KRAS, ALK, and MET amplifications, expanding its clinical applicability.
conclusionLiquid biopsy is a transformative tool in NSCLC management, offering a minimally invasive approach for mutation detection, disease monitoring, and treatment guidance. Future research should focus on multicenter trials and emerging technologies to enhance clinical integration and broaden applicability across different cancer types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.