Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40065316›Full record

SynthesisBMC cancer2025

Efficacy of liquid biopsy for genetic mutations determination in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review on literatures.

Mohammad Mehdi Jahani, Parisa Mashayekhi, Mir Davood Omrani, Azita Azimi Meibody

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Liquid biopsy in solid tumours: expert opinion paper of the European society of pathology.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mohammad Mehdi JahaniDepartment of Medical Genetics, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Parisa MashayekhiMolecular Medicine Department, Biotechnology Research Center, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran. parisamashayekhi7@gmail.com.
Mir Davood OmraniDepartment of Medical Genetics, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. davood_omrani@yahoo.co.uk.
Azita Azimi MeibodyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide and is often diagnosed at advanced stages, limiting treatment options. This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy of liquid biopsy in detecting genetic mutations in NSCLC, focusing on its sensitivity, specificity, clinical utility, and potential to guide personalized treatment strategies.

methodsA systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library to identify relevant studies published between 1990 and September 2024. Eligible studies included comparative analyses of liquid biopsy techniques for NSCLC diagnosis, prognosis, progression, or treatment response. This review adheres to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and assesses study quality using the QUADAS framework.

resultsA total of 30 studies were included. Digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) demonstrated the highest sensitivity, detecting low-frequency mutations such as EGFR T790M at levels as low as 0.01%. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) provided comprehensive mutational profiling, revealing tumor heterogeneity and co-existing mutations but required high-quality plasma samples. The cobas EGFR Mutation Test, while less sensitive than ddPCR, remains widely used due to its clinical accessibility. Emerging methods, including extracellular vesicle analysis, show promise but require further validation. Additionally, liquid biopsy effectively identified non-EGFR mutations, such as KRAS, ALK, and MET amplifications, expanding its clinical applicability.

conclusionLiquid biopsy is a transformative tool in NSCLC management, offering a minimally invasive approach for mutation detection, disease monitoring, and treatment guidance. Future research should focus on multicenter trials and emerging technologies to enhance clinical integration and broaden applicability across different cancer types.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsMutationErbB ReceptorsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansLiquid BiopsyPrognosisSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkers, TumorEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsCtDNADigital droplet PCREGFR mutationsLiquid biopsyNext-generation sequencingNon-small cell lung cancerPersonalized therapy

Identifiers

PMID40065316
PMCPMC11895383

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.