Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40065408›Full record

ReviewJournal of eating disorders2025

Interventions for improving psychological symptoms in binge eating disorder (BED) and loss of control (LOC) eating in childhood and adolescence: a systematic scoping review.

Phillipa Louise Brothwood, Julian Baudinet

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of eating disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Emotion-Related Treatments in Patients With Binge Eating Episodes-a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Phillipa Louise BrothwoodSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. phillipa.brothwood2@slam.nhs.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2863-4238
Julian BaudinetMaudsley Centre for Child and Adolescent Eating Disorders (MCCAED), South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7840-4158

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite reports of high incidence and prevalence, relatively few studies have investigated outcomes for children and adolescents with binge eating disorder (BED) and loss of control (LOC) eating. This study aimed to scope the available literature systematically.

methodsA systematic scoping review methodology was implemented. Five databases (Medline, PsycInfo, Embase, CENTRAL and Scopus) were searched on the 23rd of August 2024 for relevant peer-reviewed journal articles and dissertations. No beginning time point was specified, and the end time point was chosen as the 23rd of August 2024. Restrictions were placed on age (under 20), diagnosis (BED, LOC eating) and study design (quantitative).

resultsTen quantitative studies were identified: eight randomised controlled trials and two case series. Outcome data for 2400 young people were synthesised. Most studies (70%) had a sample size of fewer than 100 participants. Treatment modalities were heterogeneous and included psychological therapies such as cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), dialectical behavioural therapy (DBT), interpersonal therapy (IPT) and group schema therapy. One study examined the role of medication. The results suggested that six different treatment modalities (CBT (group and individual), IPT, DBT, family-based IPT (FB-IPT), and medication) were associated with a reduction in the number of binge eating episodes and LOC eating. In terms of other psychological aspects such as depression, anxiety and self-esteem, the data were sparse, and it was difficult to draw meaningful conclusions.

conclusionsThe findings highlight a paucity of evidence-based interventions in this area for young people with BED and LOC eating. This is an emerging and important field in child and adolescent eating disorders as it is now ten years since BED was introduced into the DSM-V with prevalence estimates higher than other eating disorders in this population. As the onset of binge eating often occurs in late childhood or adolescence there is a role for early intervention. Further research into the efficacy of different therapeutic options for this age group is needed. In this review, the authors searched for studies where treatment for binge eating disorder (BED) or loss of control eating (LOC) in young people (under 20 years old) had been trialled. They wanted to see which treatments could improve the mental health of young people with these conditions. To ensure that as many studies as possible were included, five different databases were searched. Ten studies were found and the majority of these were small studies with less than 100 participants. Nine of the studies investigated the role of talking therapies, for example, cognitive behavioural therapy and one study examined how medication helped. The talking therapies used in each of the nine studies were varied. The authors found that, on the whole, talking therapy and medication helped with the number of binge eating episodes and LOC eating but it was less easy to understand if they helped with depression and anxiety which are both commonly associated with BED and LOC eating. The results of this review show that more research is needed into this area as few studies were found and BED and LOC eating are becoming more frequently diagnosed in young people.

Indexed as

AdolescenceBinge eating disorderCBTChildhoodDBTInterventionsIPTLoss of control eating

Identifiers

PMID40065408
PMCPMC11895364

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.