ArticleThrombosis journal2025
Outcomes and risk factors for functional prognosis at 3 months after intravenous thrombolysis with r-tPA in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Thrombosis journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictors of unfavorable 3-month functional outcome following intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase in anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke: a prospective cohort study.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Based Risk Stratification for Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage and 3-Month Prognosis following Intravenous Thrombolysis.Cerebrovascular diseases extra · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) is the preferred treatment for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Nevertheless, only approximately half of patients undergoing IVT experience positive outcomes. The objective of the study was to examine the clinical characteristics of patients with AIS and identify predictors for unfavorable clinical outcomes at 3 months after IVT. This retrospective cohort study comprised 3805 consecutive patients diagnosed with AIS who received IVT. Patients categorized as having a poor outcome were those with a modified Rankin scale score (mRS) of 3-6, while those categorized as having a good outcome had a score of 0-2. Clinical profiles and laboratory examinations were compared among patients with differing outcomes. A logistic regression model was utilized to investigate potential factors correlated with unfavorable outcomes. Of the 3805 patients included in the study, 3176 (83.5%) were found to have a good outcome, while 629 (16.5%) experienced an poor outcome following IVT. Advancing age (OR = 1.037, P < 0.001) and higher baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores (OR = 1.156, P < 0.001) were significant independent predictors of a poor outcome. The area under curve (AUC) values for age, NIHSS score, and the combined effect of age and NIHSS score in predicting a poor response were 0.644, 0.761, and 0.777, respectively. Our research indicates that advancing age and higher baseline NIHSS score may serve as prognostic indicators for predicting early unfavorable outcomes following IVT in patients with AIS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.