ArticleJournal of hepatocellular carcinoma2025
The Diagnostic Performance of AFP, AFP-L3, DCP, CA199, and Their Combination for Primary Liver Cancer.
Article in Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment circulating micro-RNA-192 in Egyptian patients with non-viral liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Deciphering intratumoral microbiota in digestive system tumors: mechanisms and emerging therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Observational
- Current Immunotherapy Strategies and Emerging Biomarkers for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Cancers · 2025Review
- Insights into the GALAD score: A new optimal cut-off for hepatocellular carcinoma.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- YKL-40 in Virus-Associated Liver Disease: A Translational Biomarker Linking Fibrosis, Hepatocarcinogenesis, and Liver Transplantation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- From Large-Scale Characterization to Subgroup-Specific Predictive Modeling: A Study on the Diagnostic Value of Liver Stiffness Measurements in Focal Liver Lesions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The Future of Tumor Markers: Advancing Early Malignancy Detection Through Omics Technologies, Continuous Monitoring, and Personalized Reference Intervals.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Combined Model for the Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Pilot Study Comparing the Liver to Spleen Volume Ratio and Liver Vein to Cava Attenuation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Bidirectional Mendelian randomization analysis reveals significant associations between Serum DNA repair proteins and liver cancer.Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The prevalence of primary liver cancer (PLC) is rising, yet strategies for its early diagnosis remain inadequate. This study aims to identify novel biomarkers to improve the diagnostic ability of PLC. Patients and Methods: This study included 94 patients with PLC, 128 patients with benign liver disease (BLD), and 79 normal controls (NC) were included. Among the PLC group, there were 39 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), 14 patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), 4 patients with combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (CHC) and 37 patients with imaging-diagnosed HCC, respectively. Serum biomarkers and other laboratory parameters were collected and analyzed. Diagnostic values of individual and combined biomarkers for PLC were assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression identified predictors of PLC, and a nomogram model was developed based on the independent predictors. Results: AFP and DCP levels were significantly higher in the HCC patients compared to those with the BLD. AFP-L3 and CA199 levels were markedly elevated in patients with HCC, ICC, and CHC compared with the other groups. Combining AFP, AFP-L3, DCP, and CA199 increased the AUC to 0.8492 for the PLC group versus the BLD group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified sex, AFP-L3, DCP, and CA199 as independent predictors of PLC, and a reliable nomogram model was developed based on these predictors. Conclusion: The combined use of AFP, AFP-L3, DCP, and CA199 significantly enhanced the diagnostic performance of PLC compared with existing models like GALAD (gender, age, AFP, AFP-L3, and DCP), and ASAP (age, sex, AFP, DCP), as well as individual biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.