Evidence mapPaperPMID 40065984Full record

ArticleInternational journal of public health2025

A Comparative Study on the Consumption Patterns of Processed Food Among Individuals With and Without Type 2 Diabetes.

Anu Mahajan, Aditi Deshmane, Arti Muley

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anu MahajanDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Symbiosis School of Culinary Arts and Nutritional Sciences, Symbiosis International (Deemed) University, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Aditi DeshmaneDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Symbiosis School of Culinary Arts and Nutritional Sciences, Symbiosis International (Deemed) University, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Arti MuleyDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Symbiosis School of Culinary Arts and Nutritional Sciences, Symbiosis International (Deemed) University, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The study aims to analyse the eating patterns and consumption of ultra-processed food (UPFs) among individuals with and without diabetes. Methods: A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted across Pune, India, with 100 individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and 208 without diabetes. A detailed FFQ (Food Frequency Questionnaire) developed by NOVA-UPF Screener with 33 ultra-processed food items was used to evaluate the consumption patterns of UPF. Results: Most of the participants with diabetes have a habit of eating breakfast daily (68%), prefer lunch from home (72%), and about 20% avoid eating at a restaurant. While only 45.7% of the participants without diabetes have breakfast daily, and 88.4% prefer to eat lunch outside rather than homemade food. Comparative analysis shows that all 33 UPFs were consumed significantly less by individuals with diabetes than those without diabetes (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The reduced intake of UPFs highlights greater dietary caution among individuals with T2D. Therefore, these findings emphasize the importance of promoting healthy eating habits and limiting UPF consumption among the general population to prevent the onset of metabolic conditions like diabetes.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Fast FoodsFeeding BehaviorAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFood, ProcessedHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnairesconsumptiondiabetesdietary patternnon-communicable diseasesultra-processed food

Identifiers

PMID40065984
PMCPMC11891010

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.