ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Identifying major depressive disorder among US adults living alone using stacked ensemble machine learning algorithms.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Interpretable machine learning analysis of environmental characteristics on bacillary dysentery in Sichuan Province.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: It has been increasingly recognized that adults living alone have a higher likelihood of developing Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) than those living with others. However, there is still no prediction model for MDD specifically designed for adults who live alone. Objective: This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of utilizing personal health data in combination with a stacked ensemble machine learning (SEML) technique to detect MDD among adults living alone, seeking to gain insights into the interaction between personal health data and MDD. Methods: Our data originated from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) spanning 2007 to 2018. We finally selected a set of 30 easily accessible variables encompassing demographic profiles, lifestyle factors, and baseline health conditions. We constructed a SEML model for MDD detection, incorporating three conventional machine learning algorithms as base models and a Neural Network (NN) as the meta-model. Furthermore, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was used to explain the impact of each predictor on MDD. Results: The study included 2,642 adult participants who lived alone, of whom 10.6% (279 out of 2,642) had a PHQ-9 score of 10 or above, indicating the presence of MDD. The performance of our SEML model was robust, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.85. Further analysis using SHAP revealed positive correlations between the occurrence of MDD and factors such as sleep disorders, number of prescription medications, need for specific walking aids, leak urine during nonphysical activities, chronic bronchitis, and Healthy Eating Index (HEI) scores for sodium. Conversely, age, the Family Monthly Poverty Level Index (FMMPI), and HEI scores for added sugar showed negative correlations with MDD occurrence. Additionally, a U-shaped relationship was noted between the occurrence of MDD and both sleep duration and Body Mass Index (BMI), as well as HEI scores for dairy. Conclusion: The study has successfully developed a predictive model for MDD, specifically tailored for adults living alone using a stacked ensemble technique, enhancing the identification of MDD and its risk factors among adults living alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.