Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40066052›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2025

Prophages in

Paolo Gaibani, Rocco Latorre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Characterization of prophage carrying blaEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Case report of a bloodstream infection due byNew microbes and new infections · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Paolo GaibaniDepartment of Diagnostic and Public Health, Microbiology Section, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Rocco LatorreNYU Pain Research Center, New York University, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: We evaluated the distribution, epidemiology, and relationships of prophage regions among 500 Methods: Average nucleotide identity (ANI) analysis was carried out to characterize the genome at the species level and phylogenetic analysis was performed to identify the genomic relationship among Results: Prophages were found in 67.6 % (338/500) of Conclusions: We demonstrated a wide distribution and high conservation degree of the prophages among

Indexed as

Bacteroides fragilis groupEnvironmentsFragilysinPathogenic strainsProphagesVirulence factors

Identifiers

PMID40066052
PMCPMC11891724

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.