Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40066129›Full record

ReviewEJHaem2025

Invasive Fungal Disease Associated With Targeted Agents for Acute Myeloid Leukaemia: A Systematic Review.

Samir Agrawal, Anjaneya Bapat, Christopher P Eades, Shreyans Gandhi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EJHaem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Samir AgrawalQueen Mary University of London London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3294-4076
Anjaneya BapatDepartment of Infection King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6547-7342
Christopher P EadesDepartment of Infectious Diseases Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust Manchester UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2154-1776
Shreyans GandhiDepartment of Haematology King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3532-231X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To examine the incidence of invasive fungal disease (IFD) in patients receiving targeted agents for acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). Methods: Literature for this systematic review was identified through a PubMed search in April 2024, using AML, IFD and targeted therapy terms. The following filters were applied: published in the last 10 years and published in English. Results: The PubMed search yielded 54 results, of which 16 were deemed relevant for inclusion. Four additional references were identified through manual searches. The majority of publications focused on the incidence of IFD during treatment with targeted agents; the remainder focused on the efficacy of targeted treatments and reported IFD as an adverse event. Most publications were retrospective analyses. Prophylaxis use and agents differed across studies. In several studies, IFD incidence was above the 8% threshold identified for anti-mould prophylaxis. Conclusions: IFD is relatively common among patients with AML receiving targeted therapies, despite the use of prophylaxis. Prospective studies with detailed IFD reporting, together with large epidemiological studies, are required to better understand the risk factors for, and incidence and nature of IFD in this patient population.

Indexed as

acute myeloid leukaemiahaematological malignancyinvasive fungal diseaseleukaemiatargeted agenttargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID40066129
PMCPMC11892366

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.