ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Post-marketing safety surveillance of vortioxetine hydrobromide: a pharmacovigilance study leveraging FAERS database.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optimizing the diagnosis and treatment of depression in primary care: the emerging role of vortioxetine treatment.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Vortioxetine hydrobromide is a widely prescribed medication for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD), primarily exerting its antidepressant effects by inhibiting the reuptake of serotonin (5-HT).The objective of this study was to investigate adverse events (AEs) associated with vortioxetine hydrobromide through data mining in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to enhance clinical safety. Methods: We collected FAERS data from Q3 2013 to Q1 2024 for data cleansing. Disproportionality analysis was employed to quantify relevant AEs associated with vortioxetine. Reported Ratio of Ratios (ROR) was utilized for identifying risk signals within the FAERS data. We employed the System Organ Classes (SOCs) and selected the Preferred Terms (PTs) from the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA version 26.1). Results: A total of 11,298 cases were reported as "primary suspected (PS)" for vortioxetine hydrobromide. Notably, at the systemic organ level (SOC) level, the adverse effects associated with vortioxetine hydrobromide involved 27 systemic organoid classes (SOCs).We identified 150 significantly disproportionate Preferred Terms (PTs) that met all four algorithms. Conclusion: This study identified adverse events (AEs) associated with vortioxetine. Our findings offer valuable insights for optimizing the use of vortioxetine hydrobromide and reducing potential side effects, serving as a reference for its rational and safe clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.