ArticleThe Australian journal of rural health2025
Retrospective Cohort Study to Determine the Effect of Socioeconomic Status and Distance to Hospital on Negative Appendicectomy Rates in a Rural Setting.
Article in The Australian journal of rural health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe impact of socioeconomic status and distance to hospital on negative appendicectomy rates is unknown. These factors have been shown to be important predictors of health in a rural setting.
objectiveTo determine whether socioeconomic status and road distance to hospital were risk factors for negative appendicectomy.
methodsA retrospective analysis of all appendicectomies at a large rural hospital in Australia between January 2018 and December 2022 was performed. Patients' data were extracted from electronic medical records. Regression modelling was performed to determine whether socioeconomic status and road distance to hospital were risk factors for negative appendicectomy. The surgical outcomes for negative and positive appendicectomies were compared.
resultsA total of 830 patients were included in our analysis, of which 106 (12.8%) had negative appendicectomy. The rate of negative appendicectomy was not significantly impacted by socioeconomic status (OR = 1.004, 95% CI 0.989-1.20, p = 0.583) or road distance to hospital (OR = 1, 95% CI 0.998-1.001, p = 0.635). There was no significant difference in complications and 30-day readmission rates between patients in the negative and positive appendicectomy groups.
conclusionsIn a rural setting, the risk of negative appendicectomy does not increase with lower socioeconomic status and longer road distance to hospital. This challenges the prevailing notion that rural surgeons have a lower threshold to operate on patients with lower socioeconomic status or who live further away from hospitals due to the perception that these patients have less access to healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.