ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025
Regularly updated benchmark sets for statistically correct evaluations of AlphaFold applications.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Benchmarking protein sequence and structure search methods for remote homology detection.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Incorporating Surfaced-Induced Dissociation Mass Spectrometry Data into an AlphaFold-derived deep learning network improves protein structure prediction.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Enhancing protein structure prediction: evaluating the role of amino acid physicochemical features in homology search.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- The transformative impact of AI-enabled AlphaFold 3: evolution, current status, and future prospects in structural biology.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Review
- In-Silico Predictions of Drug Resistance in Lung Cancers With EGFR Mutation.Proceedings of the Platform for Advanced Scientific Computing Conference · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
AlphaFold2 changed structural biology by providing high-quality structure predictions for all possible proteins. Since its inception, a plethora of applications were built on AlphaFold2, expediting discoveries in virtually all areas related to protein science. In many cases, however, optimism seems to have made scientists forget about data leakage, a serious issue that needs to be addressed when evaluating machine learning methods. Here we provide a rigorous benchmark set that can be used in a broad range of applications built around AlphaFold2/3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.