Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40067396›Full record

ReviewHealth & justice2025

The wide-angle lens of implementation science to improve health outcomes in criminal legal settings.

Faye S Taxman, Steven Belenko

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health & justice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Faye S TaxmanGeorge Mason University, Fairfax, USA. ftaxman@gmu.edu.
Steven BelenkoTemple University, Philadelphia, USA.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Technical Assistance CoreU2CDA050097 · NIDA · GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY · PI Todd David Molfenter, Jessica Hulsey Nickel · 2019 to 2026
$37.0M
Using Implementation Interventions and Peer Recovery Support to Improve Opioid Treatment Outcomes in Community SupervisionU01DA050442 · NIDA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI BRINKLEY-RUBINSTEIN, LAUREN, MARTIN, ROSEMARIE A · 2019 to 2024
$12.6M
Action Research to Advance Implementation in the CJS: CJ-DATS 2 ContinuationU01DA016213 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI TAXMAN, FAYE S · 2002 to 2010
$6.4M
Evaluation of Stepping Up Efforts to Improve MH Services and Justice UtilizationR01MH118680 · NIMH · GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY · PI JOHNSON, JENNIFER E, TAXMAN, FAYE S · 2019 to 2023
$3.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA016213NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA050442NIDA NIH HHS U01DA050442NIDA NIH HHS U2C DA050097NIDA NIH HHS U2CDA050097NIMH NIH HHS MH118680NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH118680
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImplementation science (IS) is an emerging discipline that offers frameworks, theories, measures, and interventions to understand both the effective organizational change processes and the contextual factors that affect how well an innovation operates in real-world settings.

resultsIn this article, we present an overview of the basic concepts and methods of IS. We then present six studies where IS was used as a means to understand implementation of a new innovations designed to improve the health and well-being of individuals under criminal legal system supervision.

conclusionWe discuss how IS has developed new knowledge on how to implement efficacious innovations and suggesting future research needed to further our understanding of implementation and sustainability of innovations in the legal context.

Indexed as

Facilitators and barriers of changeImplementation scienceInner and outer settingInnovations

Identifiers

PMID40067396
PMCPMC11895217

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.