Trial reportDiabetes technology & therapeutics2025
Automated Insulin Delivery in Elderly with Type 1 Diabetes: A Prespecified Analysis of the Extension Phase.
Trial report in Diabetes technology & therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04016662 (A Randomized Cross-over Trial Evaluating Automated Insulin Delivery Technologies on Hypoglycemia and Quality of Life in Elderly Adults With Type 1 Diabetes), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized Cross-over Trial Evaluating Automated Insulin Delivery Technologies on Hypoglycemia and Quality of Life in Elderly Adults With Type 1 Diabetes
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Challenges and Opportunities for Improving Care for Type 1 Diabetes in Older Adulthood.Diabetes care · 2026Review
- 13. Older Adults: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2026.Diabetes care · 2026Review
- Article
- Research Gaps, Challenges, and Opportunities in Automated Insulin Delivery Systems.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Automated Insulin Delivery in Elderly with Type 1 Diabetes (AIDE T1D) trial randomized 82 adults ≥65 years with type 1 diabetes (T1D) to hybrid closed loop (HCL), predictive low glucose suspend (PLGS), and sensor-augmented pump (SAP) therapy in a randomized crossover trial. Seventy-five of the 78 completers joined an extension phase in which they were offered the pump mode of their choice for an additional 3 months. Mean age was 71 ± 4 years (range 65-86 years) and mean duration of T1D was 42 ± 17 years (range 1-68 years). Use of HCL was selected by 91%, PLGS by 8%, and continuous glucose monitoring with injections by 1%. For participants selecting HCL, time-in-range 70-180 mg/dL was similar in the randomized controlled trial and extension phase (mean 75% ± 10%). One severe hypoglycemic event was reported. HCL was preferred over PLGS or SAP and remained effective in older adults with T1D. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04016662.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.