Evidence mapPaperPMID 40067601Full record

SynthesisDrugs & aging2025

Medicine Optimisation and Deprescribing Intervention Outcomes for Older People with Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review.

Nicola Andrews, Cindy Brooks, Michele Board, Simon Fraser, Sue Latter, Kirsty Aplin, Beth McCausland, Eloise Radcliffe, Jay Amin, Rosemary Lim and 2 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Drugs & aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Nicola AndrewsSchool of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2595-1825
Cindy BrooksSchool of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0022-2100
Michele BoardAgeing and Dementia Research Centre, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK.
Simon FraserNational Institute of Health and Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration Wessex, Southampton, UK.
Sue LatterSchool of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Kirsty AplinMemory Assessment and Research Centre, Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Beth McCauslandMemory Assessment and Research Centre, Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Eloise RadcliffeNational Institute of Health and Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration Wessex, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5017-7256
Jay AminMemory Assessment and Research Centre, Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Rosemary LimReading School of Pharmacy, University of Reading, Reading, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1705-1480
Ellen van LeeuwenDepartment of Basic and Applied Medical Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-3155-4095
Kinda IbrahimNational Institute of Health and Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration Wessex, Southampton, UK. k.ibrahim@soton.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-5709-3867

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolypharmacy is common amongst older people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI), increasing the risk of medication-related harm. Medicine optimisation and deprescribing to reduce polypharmacy is considered feasible, safe and can lead to improved health. However, for those living with dementia or MCI, this can be challenging. This systematic review aimed to summarise the evidence on the outcomes of medicine optimisation and deprescribing interventions for older people with dementia or MCI.

methodsLiterature was searched using CINAHL, Embase, Medline, PsychINFO, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library from database inception to January 2024. Papers reporting data specific to people with dementia or MCI from medicine optimisation and deprescribing interventional research studies of any design and in any setting were included. A narrative synthesis was conducted owing to heterogeneity of study designs and outcomes. Quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.

resultsA total of 32 papers reporting on 28 studies were included, with samples ranging from 29 to 17,933 patients and a mean patient age ranging from 74 to 88 years. Of the studies, 60% were undertaken in long-term care settings. Involvement of patients and/or carers in interventions was limited. Papers were grouped as either incorporating a medication review component (n = 13), education component (n = 5) or both (n = 14). Studies primarily focussed on medication-related outcomes, generally showing a positive effect on decreasing the number and improving appropriateness of medications. Fewer papers reported clinical outcomes (behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia, falls, quality of life and cognition) with mixed findings. A reduction or no change in mortality or hospital attendance demonstrated safety of the interventions in the few papers reporting these outcomes. The quality of the evidence was mixed.

conclusionsMedicine optimisation and deprescribing interventions generally reduced the number and increased the appropriateness of medications, and although less frequently reported, these interventions seemed to be safe and showed an absence of worsening of clinical outcomes. This review highlights a need for further research, particularly in people with dementia or MCI living at home, with more focus on clinical outcomes and a greater involvement of patients and informal carers. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: The protocol was published in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) [Ref: CRD42023398139].

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionDementiaDeprescriptionsAgedAged, 80 and overHumansPolypharmacy

Identifiers

PMID40067601
PMCPMC12003602

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.