ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2025
Patient-specific coronary angioplasty simulations - A mixed-dimensional finite element modeling approach.
Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sequential Balloon Modeling for Robust Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty Simulation.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Rapid coronary artery stent computational simulation using the simplex deformable model.Medical engineering & physics · 2026Article
- Inverse analysis of patient-specific parameters of a 3D-0D closed-loop cardiovascular model with an exemplary application to an adult tetralogy of Fallot case.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2025Article
- A computational model of coronary arteries with in-stent restenosis coupling hemodynamics and pharmacokinetics with growth mechanics.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Computational modeling of drug-eluting balloons in peripheral artery disease: Mechanisms, optimization, and translational insights.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Coronary angioplasty with stent implantation is the most frequently used interventional treatment for coronary artery disease. However, reocclusion within the stent, referred to as in-stent restenosis, occurs in up to 10% of lesions. It is widely accepted that mechanical loads on the vessel wall strongly affect adaptive and maladaptive mechanisms. Yet, the role of procedural and lesion-specific influence on restenosis risk remains understudied. Computational modeling of the stenting procedure can provide new mechanistic insights, such as local stresses, that play a significant role in tissue growth and remodeling. Previous simulation studies often featured simplified artery and stent geometries and cannot be applied to real-world examples. Realistic simulations were computationally expensive since they featured fully resolved stenting device models. The aim of this work is to develop and present a mixed-dimensional formulation to simulate the patient-specific stenting procedure with a reduced-dimensional beam model for the stent and 3D models for the artery. In addition to presenting the numerical approach, we apply it to realistic cases to study the intervention's mechanical effect on the artery and correlate the findings with potential high-risk locations for in-stent restenosis. We found that high artery wall stresses develop during the coronary intervention in severely stenosed areas and at the stent boundaries. Herewith, we lay the groundwork for further studies towards preventing in-stent restenosis after coronary angioplasty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.