Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40069153›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Structure and function relationships of mucociliary clearance in human and rat airways.

Doris Roth, Ayşe Tuğçe Şahin, Feng Ling, Niels Tepho, Christiana N Senger, Erik J Quiroz, Ben A Calvert, Anne M van der Does, Tankut G Güney, Sarah Glasl and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Air pollution-induced airway epithelial barrier dysfunction in COPD: a narrative review of mechanisms and therapeutic implications.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Review
  8. Preclinical human models of primary ciliary dyskinesia.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. The importance of mechanical forces in chronic respiratory diseases.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Doris Roth *Helmholtz Pioneer Campus, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0411-3945
Ayşe Tuğçe Şahin *Helmholtz Pioneer Campus, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1005-2624
Feng LingHelmholtz Pioneer Campus, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.
Niels TephoHelmholtz Pioneer Campus, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.
Christiana N SengerDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Hastings Center for Pulmonary Research, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Erik J QuirozDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Hastings Center for Pulmonary Research, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3635-8608
Ben A CalvertDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Hastings Center for Pulmonary Research, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Anne M van der DoesPulmoScience Lab, Department of Pulmonology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Tankut G GüneyHelmholtz Pioneer Campus, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.
Sarah GlaslHelmholtz Pioneer Campus, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.
Annemarie van SchadewijkPulmoScience Lab, Department of Pulmonology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Laura von SchledornDepartment of Cardiothoracic, Transplantation and Vascular Surgery (HTTG), Leibniz Research Laboratories for Biotechnology and Artificial Organs (LEBAO), Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Ruth OlmerDepartment of Cardiothoracic, Transplantation and Vascular Surgery (HTTG), Leibniz Research Laboratories for Biotechnology and Artificial Organs (LEBAO), Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Eva KansoDepartment of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0336-585X
Janna C NawrothHelmholtz Pioneer Campus, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany. janna.nawroth@helmholtz-munich.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1898-3968
Amy L RyanDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Hastings Center for Pulmonary Research, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. amy-l-ryan@uiowa.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1363-905X

Funding

Quantitative analysis of mucociliary clearance in airway ciliopathiesR01HL153622 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI KANSO, EVA, RYAN, AMY LEANNE · 2021 to 2024
$1.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL153622U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) R01HL152633
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mucociliary clearance is a vital defense mechanism of the human airways, protecting against harmful particles and infections. When this process fails, it contributes to respiratory diseases like chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma. While advances in single-cell transcriptomics have revealed the complexity of airway composition, much of what we know about how airway structure impacts clearance relies on animal studies. This limits our ability to create accurate human-based models of airway diseases. Here we show that the airways in female rats and in humans exhibit species-specific differences in the distribution of ciliated and secretory cells as well as in ciliary beat, resulting in significantly higher clearance effectiveness in humans. We further reveal that standard lab-grown cultures exhibit lower clearance effectiveness compared to human airways, and we identify the underlying structural differences. By combining diverse experiments and physics-based modeling, we establish universal benchmarks to assess human airway function, interpret preclinical models, and better understand disease-specific impairments in mucociliary clearance.

Indexed as

Mucociliary ClearanceAnimalsCiliaFemaleHumansMaleRatsSpecies SpecificityTrachea

Identifiers

PMID40069153
PMCPMC11897160

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.