Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40069456›Full record

ArticleNature medicine2025

Atlas of genetic and phenotypic associations across 42 female reproductive health diagnoses.

Natàlia Pujol Gualdo, Jelisaveta Džigurski, Valentina Rukins, Fanny-Dhelia Pajuste, Brooke N Wolford, Mariann Võsa, Mia Golob, Lisette Haug, Maris Alver, Kristi Läll and 6 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Natàlia Pujol GualdoEstonian Genome Center, Institute of Genomics, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Jelisaveta DžigurskiEstonian Genome Center, Institute of Genomics, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2885-6241
Valentina RukinsEstonian Genome Center, Institute of Genomics, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-0888-1169
Fanny-Dhelia PajusteEstonian Genome Center, Institute of Genomics, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6014-0537
Brooke N WolfordHUNT Center for Molecular and Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3153-1552
Mariann VõsaEstonian Genome Center, Institute of Genomics, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Mia GolobEstonian Genome Center, Institute of Genomics, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Lisette HaugEstonian Genome Center, Institute of Genomics, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Maris AlverEstonian Genome Center, Institute of Genomics, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Kristi LällEstonian Genome Center, Institute of Genomics, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Maire PetersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Ben M BrumptonHUNT Center for Molecular and Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3058-1059
Estonian Biobank Research Team
Priit PaltaEstonian Genome Center, Institute of Genomics, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9320-7008
Reedik MägiEstonian Genome Center, Institute of Genomics, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Triin LaiskEstonian Genome Center, Institute of Genomics, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia. triin.laisk@ut.ee.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1501-9030

Funding

EC | European Regional Development Fund (Europski Fond za Regionalni Razvoj) 2014-2020.4.01.15-0012EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020) 813707Eesti Teadusagentuur (Estonian Research Council) PRG1076Eesti Teadusagentuur (Estonian Research Council) PRG1911Eesti Teadusagentuur (Estonian Research Council) PSG776Eesti Teadusagentuur (Estonian Research Council) TK214
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genetic background of many female reproductive health diagnoses remains uncharacterized, compromising our understanding of the underlying biology. Here, we map the genetic architecture across 42 female-specific health conditions using data from up to 293,618 women from two large population-based cohorts, the Estonian Biobank and the FinnGen study. Our study illustrates the utility of genetic analyses in understanding women's health better. As specific examples, we describe genetic risk factors for ovarian cysts that elucidate the genetic determinants of folliculogenesis and, by leveraging population-specific variants, uncover new candidate genes for uterine fibroids. We find that most female reproductive health diagnoses have a heritable component, with varying degrees of polygenicity and discoverability. Finally, we identify pleiotropic loci and genes that function in genital tract development (WNT4, PAX8, WT1, SALL1), hormonal regulation (FSHB, GREB1, BMPR1B, SYNE1/ESR1) and folliculogenesis (CHEK2), underlining their integral roles in female reproductive health.

Indexed as

Reproductive HealthAdultCohort StudiesEstoniaFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansLeiomyomaPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideRisk Factors

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.