ArticleBMC gastroenterology2025
Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for predicting the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis B: a case-control study.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Coagulation Risk Prediction in Patients With Liver Failure: Integrated Meta-Analysis and Machine Learning Model Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Pooled it
- Building and Validating an Explainable Machine Learning Model for Predicting Health-Promoting Behaviors in Older Adults: A Multicenter Study.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026Article
- The correlation between telomere length of the peripheral blood basophil and the risk and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Development and validation of machine learning models for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma risk and survival in patients with diabetic cirrhosis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma Precursor Lesions: From Pathological Basis to Risk Stratification and Precision Intervention.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2026Review
- Interpretable ensemble learning for tumor-type prediction with a SHAP-based evaluation of CatBoost and voting classifiers.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Explainable artificial intelligence and ensemble learning for hepatocellular carcinoma classification: State of the art, performance, and clinical implications.World journal of hepatology · 2025Review
- Epileptic Seizure Detection Using Machine Learning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Brain sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study was to develop and internally validate an interpretable machine learning (ML) model for predicting the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection.
methodsWe retrospectively collected clinical data from patients with HCC and CHB treated at the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University from January 2022 to December 2022, including demographics, comorbidities, and laboratory parameters. The datasets were randomly divided into a training set (361 cases) and a validation set (155 cases) in a 7:3 ratio. Variables were screened using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) and multifactor logistic regression. The prediction model of HCC risk in CHB patients was constructed based on five machine learning models, including logistic regression (LR), K-nearest neighbour (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF) and artificial neural network (ANN). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the predictive performance of the model in terms of identification, calibration and clinical application. The SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) method was used to rank the importance of the features and explain the final model.
resultsAmong the five ML models constructed, the RF model has the best performance, and the RF model predicts the risk of HCC in patients with CHB in the training set [AUC: 0.996, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.991-0.999)] and internal validation set [AUC: 0.993, 95% CI (0.986-1.000)]. It has high AUC, specificity, sensitivity, F1 score and low Brier score. Calibration showed good agreement between observed and predicted risks. The model yielded higher positive net benefits in DCA than when all participants were considered to be at high or low risk, indicating good clinical utility. In addition, the SHAP plot of the RF showed that age, basophil/lymphocyte ratio (BLR), D-Dimer, aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase (AST/ALT), γ-glutamyltransferase (GGT) and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) can help identify patients with CHB who are at high or low risk of developing HCC.
conclusionML models can be used as a tool to predict the risk of HCC in patients with CHB. The RF model has the best predictive performance and helps clinicians to identify high-risk patients and intervene early to reduce or delay the occurrence of HCC. However, the model needs to be further improved through large sample studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.