ArticleBMC public health2025
Assessing the impact of a mandatory calorie labelling policy in out-of-home food outlets in England on consumer behaviour: a natural experimental study.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Examining use of restaurant nutrition information among adults living in England engaged in disordered eating or weight management efforts.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Calorie labelling regulations in England: menu change not behaviour change?Public health nutrition · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOut-of-home (OOH) food tends to be energy-dense and nutrient-poor. In response, England implemented a mandatory calorie labelling policy in the OOH sector. We evaluated changes in consumer behaviours after the policy was implemented in April 2022.
methodsWe employed a natural experimental design to assess pre-post changes in noticing and using nutrition information, and behaviours associated with menu labelling. We compared changes in England to comparator jurisdictions without similar policies. Data included four consecutive years (2019-2022) from the International Food Policy Study; participants were adults aged 18 years or older. Mixed effects logistic regression models assessed pre-post changes in binary outcomes, and mixed effects negative binomial regression assessed changes in frequency of OOH eating.
resultsIn England, noticing nutrition information increased from 16.0% (95% CI 15.6 to 16.4) in 2020 to 19.7% (95% CI 19.1 to 20.2) in 2021 and to 25.8% (95% CI 25.5 to 26.1) in 2022. This increase was 4.8% points (95% CI 2.5 to 7.1) higher in England versus the comparator group. Using nutrition information increased in England from 8.0% (95% CI 7.5 to 8.4) in 2020 to 11.8% (95% CI 10.9 to 12.6) in 2021 and to 13.5% (95% CI 13.1 to 13.9) in 2022. There was a 2.7% points (95% CI 2.0 to 3.4) greater increase in England versus the comparator group from 2020 to 2021. Ordering something different was the only behaviour associated with nutrition information that increased after implementation of the policy in England: from 12.6% (95% CI 12.4 to 12.7) in 2020 to 15.2% (95% CI 14.7 to 15.6) in 2021 and to 17.7% (95% CI 17.6 to 17.8) in 2022. There was a 2.8% points (95% CI 1.8 to 3.9) greater increase in England versus the comparator group from 2021 to 2022. Frequency of OOH eating did not change after policy implementation.
conclusionsThe introduction of mandatory calorie labelling in England led to increases in self-reported noticing and using, with the key behavioural impact on ordering something different. Additional strategies may be required to maximise the public health benefits of calorie labelling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.