ArticleMolecular pain
Article in Molecular pain. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of computer-assisted and conventional local anaesthesia on pain and anxiety in children with molar incisor hypomineralisation: a randomized controlled clinical trial.BMC oral health · 2026Trial
- Combination of GABA-derived short peptides and pregabalin in neuropathic pain: In vivo and in silico evaluation.Molecular painArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo investigate the efficacy of medicinal plant bioactive secondary metabolites as inhibitors of voltage-gated sodium channels (Nav1.7, Nav1.8, and Nav1.9) in managing painful states of dental pulps. METHODOLOGY: Molecular docking, ADME prediction, toxicity profiling, and pharmacophore modeling were used to assess the binding affinities, pharmacokinetic properties, toxicological profiles, and active pharmacophores of the selected bioactive compounds.
resultsThree compounds (Sepaconitine, Lappaconitine, and Ranaconitine) showed binding affinities (ΔG = -8.95 kcal/mol, -7.77 kcal/mol, and -7.44 kcal/mol, respectively) with all three Nav1.7, Nav1.8, and Nav1.9 sodium channels. The sepaconitine amine group formed hydrophobic interactions with key residues. The Lappaconitine benzene ring contributed to hydrophobic interactions and hydrogen bond acceptor interactions. The hydrophobic interactions of the ranaconitine amine group play a critical role with specific residues on Nav1.8 and Nav1.9.
conclusionThe natural fusicoccane diterpenoid derivatives Sepaconitine, Lappaconitine, and Ranaconitine are potential lead compounds for the development of novel analgesics as selective antihyperalgesic drugs, which will provide a new dental pharmacological intervention for managing painful dental pulp conditions. Further experimental validation and clinical studies that confirm the efficacy and safety of these compounds will strengthen their applicability in dental practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.