Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40070333›Full record

ReviewCurrent drug safety2026

Revealing the Future of Pharmacovigilance in Precision Pharmaceutical Monitoring.

Vishnu Mittal, Anjali Sharma

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current drug safety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Vishnu MittalDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Guru Gobind Singh College of Pharmacy, Yamuna Nagar, Haryana, India.
Anjali SharmaDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Guru Gobind Singh College of Pharmacy, Yamuna Nagar, Haryana, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing popularity of personalized medicine presents new hazards and difficulties for pharmacovigilance. This implies that it needs to modify its current approach. This research examines how drug safety monitoring for certain medications evolves over time. We briefly discuss the connection between meticulous pharmacovigilance procedures and adaptable treatment approaches. We describe how pharmacogenetics may be used to make drugs safer and how genetic testing may be used to forecast a drug's potential side effects. With an emphasis on post-marketing monitoring in phase IV, we address shortcomings of research on pre-marketing and the need for a comprehensive strategy for medication safety. The significance of pharmacogenetics in reducing risk before exposure and the need to reconsider pharmacoepidemiological techniques for monitoring outcomes after exposure are discussed in the study. We emphasize the significance of including genetic patient-specific profiles in publications related to tailored therapy and the use of state-of-the-art computer techniques for data processing. We also discuss privacy, ethical, and data security issues that arise with precision medicine, emphasizing the consequences for patient consent and data management.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsPharmacovigilancePrecision MedicineHumansPharmacogeneticsdrug safetypatient outcomesPersonalized medicinepharmacogenomicspharmacovigilanceprecision medicine.

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.