ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025
Leveraging near-real-time patient and population data to incorporate fluctuating risk of severe COVID-19: development and prospective validation of a personalised risk prediction tool.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multi-omics and machine learning identify novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets of COVID-19.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Novel strategies that account for population-level changes in dominant variants, immunity, testing practices and changes in individual risk profiles are needed to identify patients who remain at high risk of severe COVID-19. The aim of this study was to develop and prospectively validate a tool to predict absolute risk of severe COVID-19 incorporating dynamic parameters at the patient and population levels that could be used to inform clinical care. Methods: A retrospective cohort of vaccinated US Veterans with SARS-CoV-2 from July 1, 2021, through August 25, 2023 was created. Models were estimated using logistic-regression-based machine learning with backward selection and included a variable with fluctuating absolute risk of severe COVID-19 to account for temporal changes. Age, sex, vaccine type, fully boosted status, and prior infection before vaccination were included Findings: 216,890 SARS-CoV-2 infections in Veterans not treated with oral antivirals were included (median age, 65; 88% male). The development cohort included 165,303 patients (66,121 in the training set, 49,591 in the tuning set, and 49,591 in the testing set) and the prospective validation cohort included 51,587 patients. The percentage of severe infections ranged from 5% to 25%. Model performance improved until 24 clinical predictor variables including age, co-morbidities, and immune-suppressive medications plus a 30-day rolling risk window were included (AUC in development cohort, 0.88 (95% CI, 0.87-0.88), AUC in prospective validation, 0.85 (95% CI, 0.84-0.85), Brier Score, 0.13). The most important variables for predicting severe disease included age, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Alzheimer's disease, heart failure, and anaemia. Glucocorticoid use during the one-month prior to COVID-19 diagnosis was the next most important predictor. Models that included a near-real time fluctuating population risk variable performed better than models stratified by circulating variant and models with dominant variant included as a predictor. Patients with predicted severe disease risk >3% who received oral antivirals had approximately 4-fold lower rates of severe COVID-19 untreated patients at a similar risk level. Interpretation: Our novel risk prediction tool uses a simple method to adjust for temporal changes and can be implemented to facilitate uptake of evidence-based therapies. The study provides proof-of-concept for leveraging real-time data to support risk prediction that incorporates changing population-level trends and variation patient-level risk. Funding: This work was supported by the VA Boston Cooperative Studies Programme. WBE was supported by VA HSR&D IIR 20-076; VA HSR&D IIR 20-101; VA National Artificial Intelligence Institute.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.