ArticleInternational journal of endocrinology and metabolism2024
Optimal Cut-off Points of the Standardized Continuous Metabolic Syndrome Severity Score (cMetS-S) for Predicting Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) and CVD Mortality in the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study (TLGS).
Article in International journal of endocrinology and metabolism, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cardiovascular Disease Mortality Events and Predictors in the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study: A 20-Year Cohort Review .International journal of endocrinology and metabolism · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) is a prevalent condition associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and CVD mortality. Due to the limited clinical applicability of MetS, the standardized continuous metabolic syndrome severity score (cMetS-S) has the potential to provide continuous assessment of metabolic risk. Objectives: This study evaluated the optimal cMetS-S cut-off points in the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study (TLGS) for predicting CVD and CVD mortality. Methods: The study included 7,776 participants over 30 years old at baseline, followed for 18 years. Sex-specific sensitivity (SS) and specificity (SP) of cMetS-S measures for predicting CVD and CVD mortality were evaluated using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, along with the area under the curve (AUC), employing a naive estimator and considering event failure status and MetS variables. Results: The cut-off point of cMetS-S for CVD was 0.13 (SS: 65.5%, SP: 59.6%) for the total population, 0.44 (SS: 49.6%, SP: 68.1%) for men, and 0.27 (SS: 64.2%, SP: 69.2%) for women. The cut-off point of cMetS-S for CVD mortality was 0.53 (SS: 51.3%, SP: 71.9%) for the total population, 0.76 (SS: 35.1%, SP: 76.2%) for men, and 0.28 (SS: 78.8%, SP: 66.4%) for women. The AUC (95% CI) of MetS based on the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) and Joint Interim Statement (JIS) definitions were 60.0 (65.3 - 56.8) and 61.1 (59.6 - 56.8) for CVD, and 59.3 (56.0 - 62.5) and 59.4 (56.3 - 62.6) for CVD mortality. Conclusions: The cut-off points of cMetS-S for CVD and CVD mortality differ between men and women. The cMetS-S could be a better predictive tool for CVD and CVD mortality than MetS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.