Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40071470›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2025

Attitudes toward conservative management of pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence with vaginal pessaries: A national survey among Israeli obstetricians and gynecologists.

Nadav Cohen, Reut Rotem, Adi Y Weintraub, May Shafir, Yael Barkan, Noga Porat, Ariel Zilberlicht

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Attitudes toward conservative management of pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence with vaginal pessaries: A national survey among Israeli obstetricians and gynecologists.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nadav CohenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center, Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Reut RotemDepartment of Urogynaecology, Cork University Maternity Hospital, Cork, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4063-5911
Adi Y WeintraubDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Soroka University Medical Center, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
May ShafirDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center, Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Yael BarkanClalit Health Care, Netanya, Israel.
Noga PoratMaccabi Health Care, Rishon LeTsiyon, Israel.
Ariel ZilberlichtDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center, Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore the views of Israeli gynecologists regarding the use of vaginal pessaries for management of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI), which are common medical conditions that affect women and can significantly impact their quality of life.

methodsAn electronic survey containing questions assessing knowledge, training, and attitudes regarding the use of vaginal pessaries for POP and SUI was distributed among Israeli gynecologists. Data were collected and recorded anonymously. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the responses.

resultsA total of 700 emails were sent, with a response rate of 53% (371 responses). The majority of respondents (76.4%, n = 283) consulted a urogynecologist before and after fitting a pessary; however, 60.4% (n = 224) felt that any gynecologist should be able to follow up on such cases. When stratified by years of experience, physicians with fewer than 10 years of experience were more likely to offer pessary treatment (31.6%, n = 117 vs. 19.1%, n = 71, P < 0.01). However, those who did not offer pessaries felt more uncertain about fitting them and were more likely to report a lack of experience (24.8%, n = 92 vs. 13.6%, n = 50, P < 0.01, and 18.0%, n = 67 vs. 6.2%, n = 23, P < 0.01, respectively).

conclusionsOur survey highlights a gap in knowledge and training among Israeli gynecologists regarding the conservative management of POP and SUI with vaginal pessaries. There is a clear desire among physicians to acquire these skills. The establishment of formal training programs is crucial to bridging this gap and improving women's health outcomes.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelConservative TreatmentGynecologyPelvic Organ ProlapsePessariesUrinary Incontinence, StressAdultFemaleGynecologistsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansIsraelMaleMiddle AgedObstetriciansObstetricspelvic organ prolapsequestionnairestress urinary incontinencetrainingvaginal pessary

Identifiers

PMID40071470
PMCPMC12255908

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.