Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40071982›Full record

ArticleEFORT open reviews2025

DNA methylation and its influence on the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis: a systematic literature review.

Thomas Nau, Samira Cutts, Nerissa Naidoo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFORT open reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Samira Cutts
Nerissa Naidoo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Evolving evidence demonstrates the role of epigenetics in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis (OA), whereas in terms of mechanism, DNA methylation has received the highest attention thus far. This systematic review summarizes the current knowledge of DNA methylation and its influence on the pathogenesis of OA. Methods: A protocol in alignment with the PRISMA guidelines was employed to systematically review eight bibliographic databases between 1 January 2015 and 31 January 2021, to identify associations between DNA methylation and articular chondrocytes in OA. Results: We identified 23 gene-specific studies and 28 genome-wide methylation analyses. Gene-specific studies focused on pro-inflammatory markers in OA, demonstrating that DNA hypomethylation in the promoter region results in overexpression and hypermethylation is linked to gene silencing. Others reported on the association between OA risk genes and DNA methylation. Genome-wide methylation studies reported on differentially methylated regions (DMRs) comparing OA and non-OA chondrocytes. DMRs were seen in hip OA and knee OA chondrocytes. Conclusion: The current body of literature demonstrates the potential and crucial role of DNA methylation in the pathogenesis and progression of OA. This knowledge contributes to the understanding of the pathomechanisms behind OA at gene-specific and genome-wide levels. The observed differences in DNA methylation between healthy and diseased tissues indicate the occurrence of changes in DNA methylation. Based on this, future research in this field that explores the characteristics of potentially reversible changes in DNA methylation may lead to opportunities for causative treatment options for OA.

Indexed as

DNA methylationepigeneticosteoarthritis

Identifiers

PMID40071982
PMCPMC11825139

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.