Evidence mapPaperPMID 40072104Full record

ReviewCells2025

Diabetic Retinopathy (DR): Mechanisms, Current Therapies, and Emerging Strategies.

Hyewon Seo, Sun-Ji Park, Minsoo Song

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hyewon SeoNew Drug Development Center, Daegu-Gyeongbukk Medical Innovation Foundation (K-MEDI hub), 80 Cheombok-ro, Dong-gu, Daegu 41061, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8248-3947
Sun-Ji ParkNew Drug Development Center, Daegu-Gyeongbukk Medical Innovation Foundation (K-MEDI hub), 80 Cheombok-ro, Dong-gu, Daegu 41061, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-4921-0239
Minsoo SongNew Drug Development Center, Daegu-Gyeongbukk Medical Innovation Foundation (K-MEDI hub), 80 Cheombok-ro, Dong-gu, Daegu 41061, Republic of Korea.

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2022M3A9J4079468
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is one of the most prevalent complications of diabetes, affecting nearly one-third of patients with diabetes mellitus and remaining a leading cause of blindness worldwide. Among the various diabetes-induced complications, DR is of particular importance due to its direct impact on vision and the irreversible damage to the retina. DR is characterized by multiple pathological processes, primarily a hyperglycemia-induced inflammatory response and oxidative stress. Current gold standard therapies, such as anti-VEGF injections and photocoagulation, have shown efficacy in slowing disease progression. However, challenges such as drug resistance, partial therapeutic responses, and the reliance on direct eye injections-which often result in low patient compliance-remain unresolved. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the underlying molecular mechanisms in DR, the current therapies, and their unmet needs for DR treatment. Additionally, emerging therapeutic strategies for improving DR treatment outcomes are discussed.

Indexed as

Diabetic RetinopathyAnimalsHumansOxidative Stressdiabetic complicationsdiabetic retinopathyinflammationmolecular mechanismoxidative stresstherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID40072104
PMCPMC11898816

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.