ArticleJournal, genetic engineering & biotechnology2025
Identifying promising peptide targets for leprosy serological tests: From prediction to ELISA.
Article in Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biosensor-Based Platforms for the Detection and Screening ofACS infectious diseases · 2026Review
- A Multiepitope Protein Based on Selected Synthetic Peptides Enables Effective Serological Screening of Exposure toACS omega · 2026Article
- Serological Evidence of Soil-Transmitted Helminth Infections as a Potential Risk for Severity in Leprosy Patients.Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH · 2025Article
- Hansen's Disease in Ecuador: Current Status, Knowledge Gaps, and Research Priorities: A Literature Review.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Leprosy remains a significant health concern, particularly in India, Brazil, and Indonesia. Early diagnosis is essential to prevent complications, highlighting the need for improved diagnostic tools. This study aimed to identify novel Mycobacterium leprae antigens and assess their effectiveness against human sera through immunotools for antibody response evaluation. Using bioinformatics, we predicted B-cell epitopes in M. leprae, which were chemically synthesized and tested via dot blotting with sera from leprosy patients, tuberculosis patients, and healthy controls. Promising peptides underwent further analysis through ELISA using 465 serum samples from leprosy patients, household contacts, and healthy controls across Brazil. The samples were also tested against known antigens HSA-NDO, LID-1, and NDO-LID. A total of 102 epitope sequences were generated, of which eight (PEP1 to PEP8) demonstrated the ability to differentiate between individuals with and without exposure to M. leprae. The results of the ELISA test exhibited statistically significant differences in absorbance responses between the experimental groups for the novel synthetic peptides (p < 0.05). PEP3, PEP4, and PEP5 demonstrated the most favorable outcomes, with values of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.9759, 0.9796 and 0.9551 respectively in the comparison of healthy controls with household contacts, and 0.8257, 0.7945, and 0.7961 comparing the same controls with patients. Furthermore, the synthetic peptides demonstrated superior sensitivity, specificity, and AUC compared to HSA-NDO, LID-1, and NDO-LID. The identified peptides showed significant responses in samples from patients and household contacts (HHC), indicating their potential for tracing exposure to M. leprae bacilli. These novel synthetic peptides could enhance the sensitivity of rapid diagnostic tests for leprosy, facilitating early detection of the infection. This could help prevent disease progression and interrupt transmission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.