ArticleEndocrine2025
Efficacy and safety of pasireotide in patients with Cushing's disease: a monocentric experience.
Article in Endocrine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- [Genetic, endocrine, drug-induced and pancreatogenic forms of diabetes and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (Update 2026)].Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2026Review
- Real-World Experience with Pasireotide-LAR in Cushing's Disease: Single-Center 12-Month Observational Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePasireotide is the first pituitary-directed approved therapy for Cushing's disease (CD), effective in reducing 24 h urine free cortisol (UFC) > 50% in more than half of patients, with beneficial effects and with a relatively high incidence of hyperglycemia. The aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of long-term treatment with pasireotide (PAS) in CD patients, also according to gender.
methodsWe retrospectively evaluated 19 consecutive CD patients (13F; age at diagnosis: 34.9 ± 11.7 yrs) treated with PAS, referred to and followed-up at the Endocrine Unit of the University Hospital of Messina, from 2013 to 2023. We evaluated and compared, in the whole cohort and after gender stratification, anthropometric, clinical, neuroradiological, hormonal and metabolic parameters, along with CD-related comorbidities, before PAS treatment and at last follow-up visit. Side-effects and adverse events related to treatment were also assessed.
resultsUnder PAS treatment: overall, 52.6% of patients achieved a normalization of UFCxULN from baseline without any difference in terms of UFC reduction and/or response to treatment according to gender; two females out of the 19 patients experienced tumor shrinkage. In the whole cohort, at last follow-up visit as compared to baseline: body weight, BMI, total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol were significantly improved, while HbA1c significantly increased. Prevalence of CD-related comorbidities did not change significantly, while the number of patients with IGF-1 SDS below the sex/age adjusted normal range significantly increased. Stratifying patients by sex, at last follow-up visit vs. baseline, we observed lower total and LDL-cholesterol in men and lower waist circumference in women. Most common adverse events were related to hyperglycemia which led to treatment withdrawal in 3 cases, without any gender difference. Response to PAS correlated with younger age at diagnosis, longer duration of disease, lower Hb1Ac levels and absence of diabetes at baseline.
conclusionPAS is effective in a significant number of patients with CD, regardless of gender, having a positive impact on lipid profile and on anthropometric parameters. Major adverse events are related to hyperglycemia which is more frequently associated with a worse baseline glycometabolic and lipid profile in both sexes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40075004What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.