ArticleBMC genomics2025
Improving genetic variant identification for quantitative traits using ensemble learning-based approaches.
Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hybrid origin and phenotype evolution of the modern maize.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2026Review
- Incorporating GO/KEGG Functional Annotations Improves the Accuracy and Stability of Genomic Prediction Across Diverse Beef Cattle Populations.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGenome-wide association studies (GWAS) are rapidly advancing due to the improved resolution and completeness provided by Telomere-to-Telomere (T2T) and pangenome assemblies. While recent advancements in GWAS methods have primarily focused on identifying genetic variants associated with discrete phenotypes, approaches for quantitative traits (QTs) remain underdeveloped. This has often led to significant variants being overlooked due to biases from genotype multicollinearity and strict p-value thresholds.
resultsWe propose an enhanced ensemble learning approach for QT analysis that integrates regularized variant selection with machine learning-based association methods, validated through comprehensive biological enrichment analysis. We benchmarked four widely recognized single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) feature selection methods-least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, ridge regression, elastic-net, and mutual information-alongside four association methods: linear regression, random forest, support vector regression (SVR), and XGBoost. Our approach is evaluated on simulated datasets and validated using a subset of the PennCATH real dataset, including imputed versions, focusing on low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol levels as a QT. The combination of elastic-net with SVR outperformed other methods across all datasets. Functional annotation of top 100 SNPs identified through this superior ensemble method revealed their expression in tissues involved in LDL cholesterol regulation. We also confirmed the involvement of six known genes (APOB, TRAPPC9, RAB2A, CCL24, FCHO2, and EEPD1) in cholesterol-related pathways and identified potential drug targets, including APOB, PTK2B, and PTPN12.
conclusionsIn conclusion, our ensemble learning approach effectively identifies variants associated with QTs, and we expect its performance to improve further with the integration of T2T and pangenome references in future GWAS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.