ArticleMolecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Identification of two biological subgroups of complex regional pain syndrome type 1 by transcriptomic profiling of skin and blood in women.
Article in Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comprehensive Mechanisms and Non-Invasive Treatment for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A Narrative Review.Journal of pain research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) present prolonged, debilitating pain and functional impairment. Treatments are not disease-modifying due to the poorly understood underlying pathomechanisms. This study aimed to identify the molecular signatures of potential CRPS type 1 subgroups.
methodsTwelve women with CRPS type 1 were included. Demographics and pain questionnaires were recorded. Skin biopsies of the affected and non-affected limbs (n = 6 + 6) and peripheral blood (n = 11) were collected. RNA sequencing was performed on skin and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Twenty cytokines were quantified in blood plasma (n = 12).
resultsCluster analysis of the affected skin identified two CRPS subgroups (SG). SG1 exhibited increased gene expression related to epidermal development, metabolic processes, and a greater abundance of keratinocytes. SG2 showed enhanced transcriptomic changes in inflammatory, immune, and fibrotic processes, along with higher abundance of fibroblasts, macrophages, and endothelial cells. PBMCs transcriptomics revealed the same SG1/SG2 clusters and highlighted a stronger inflammatory response in the blood of SG1, suggesting distinct tissue-specific immune responses for the subgroups. Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RA) levels were higher in the blood plasma of SG1 (FDR = 0.01), consistent with its encoding gene IL1RN expression in PBMCs (log2 FC = 1.10, P < 0.001) and affected skin (log2 FC = 0.88, P = 0.006). Subgroups did not differ in demographic or clinical parameters but correlations among clinical factors varied between them.
conclusionsThis study identified two potential biological subgroups of CRPS type 1 in women through skin and blood transcriptomic profiling, advancing the understanding of this condition. This could facilitate the development of targeted treatments for CRPS type 1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.