ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
Letter: effects of dexamethasone combined with vitamin B12 on percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy early outcomes: a randomized controlled trial.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cheng He et al. evaluated the effect of dexamethasone combined with vitamin B12 on early outcomes following percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID). While the study offers valuable insights, we have several constructive suggestions. The lack of a standardized anesthesia protocol (local vs. general anesthesia) may have influenced the results, as patients under local anesthesia were awake during the procedure. Previous studies suggest intraoperative communication and patient awareness can impact pain levels and recovery. To clarify the effect of anesthesia type on recovery, we recommend conducting a subgroup analysis based on the anesthesia method. Although the CT group(combined treatment) showed satisfactory pain control (VAS < 3.3), the observed VAS score between days 1 and 3 may not reflect the actual patient experience. Except for the VAS score for leg pain on the third day after surgery, the net intergroup differences at other time points were less than the minimal clinically important differences recommended in the literature(a change of 10 for the 100 mm pain VAS). Furthermore, the study does not assess patient satisfaction with pain management, making it difficult to determine the clinical importance of the treatment effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.