Evidence mapPaperPMID 40075570Full record

ReviewCancers2025

Revolutionizing MASLD: How Artificial Intelligence Is Shaping the Future of Liver Care.

Nicola Pugliese, Arianna Bertazzoni, Cesare Hassan, Jörn M Schattenberg, Alessio Aghemo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. [Research progress and future prospects for artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and treatment of fatty liver disease].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nicola PuglieseDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Pieve Emanuele, MI, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6466-1412
Arianna BertazzoniDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Pieve Emanuele, MI, Italy.ORCID 0009-0005-5582-495X
Cesare HassanDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Pieve Emanuele, MI, Italy.
Jörn M SchattenbergDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Saarland University Medical Center, 66421 Homburg, Germany.
Alessio AghemoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Pieve Emanuele, MI, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is emerging as a leading cause of chronic liver disease. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has attracted significant attention in healthcare, particularly in diagnostics, patient management, and drug development, demonstrating immense potential for application and implementation. In the field of MASLD, substantial research has explored the application of AI in various areas, including patient counseling, improved patient stratification, enhanced diagnostic accuracy, drug development, and prognosis prediction. However, the integration of AI in hepatology is not without challenges. Key issues include data management and privacy, algorithmic bias, and the risk of AI-generated inaccuracies, commonly referred to as "hallucinations". This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the applications of AI in hepatology, with a focus on MASLD, highlighting both its transformative potential and its inherent limitations.

Indexed as

chatbotdeep machine learningfatty liver diseaseliver steatosismetabolic syndrome

Identifiers

PMID40075570
PMCPMC11899536

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.